Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Marcianopolis AE
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="nicholasz219, post: 7651412, member: 75641"][USER=99456]@Sulla80[/USER] Thank you for the mention and the excellent post. To me these coins are fascinating as well as the whole of the province of Moesia Inferior. </p><p><br /></p><p>After Trajan conquered Dacia in 106, it appears that the provinces of Thrace/Moesia became a relatively sleepy place with military outposts and small supportive settlements around them. Then during the time of Severus like [USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER] mentioned, Moesia Inferior was created and there is an explosion of coinage from the towns there, in particular Nikopolis ad Istrum and Markianopolis. Under Commodus, for example, Varbanov lists 69 issues. Under Septimius, that number rises to over 600 not including issues of Severus and Domna, Severus and Caracalla, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>My theory is that while most provincial towns remained relatively unimportant if they were provincial backwaters, the towns favored by the emperor could see a substantial increase in coin production. I think early support from the Balkan provinces during his campaign for emperor brought favor upon cities such as Nikopolis and Markianopolis whereas others such as Antioch in Syria who if not declared for, were in the unfortunate position of being in a province controlled by Pescennius Niger, were punished by heavy levies and restriction upon their coinage which would have a severe financial impact upon the city.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of this supposes that attention was paid to the particular towns by the imperial household but given the jockeying by various towns (Nicaea and Nicomedia come to mind) for honors such as the neokoros designation, I do not think the concept is that far fetched. Certainly the stationing of an army can drive up coin production (see Second Punic War in Spain) but I also suspect something else was at work.</p><p><br /></p><p>I’ve added several new coins of Markianopolis and Nikopolis since that post but I’ll spare everyone except a link:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=6295" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=6295" rel="nofollow">https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=6295</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Nick[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="nicholasz219, post: 7651412, member: 75641"][USER=99456]@Sulla80[/USER] Thank you for the mention and the excellent post. To me these coins are fascinating as well as the whole of the province of Moesia Inferior. After Trajan conquered Dacia in 106, it appears that the provinces of Thrace/Moesia became a relatively sleepy place with military outposts and small supportive settlements around them. Then during the time of Severus like [USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER] mentioned, Moesia Inferior was created and there is an explosion of coinage from the towns there, in particular Nikopolis ad Istrum and Markianopolis. Under Commodus, for example, Varbanov lists 69 issues. Under Septimius, that number rises to over 600 not including issues of Severus and Domna, Severus and Caracalla, etc. My theory is that while most provincial towns remained relatively unimportant if they were provincial backwaters, the towns favored by the emperor could see a substantial increase in coin production. I think early support from the Balkan provinces during his campaign for emperor brought favor upon cities such as Nikopolis and Markianopolis whereas others such as Antioch in Syria who if not declared for, were in the unfortunate position of being in a province controlled by Pescennius Niger, were punished by heavy levies and restriction upon their coinage which would have a severe financial impact upon the city. All of this supposes that attention was paid to the particular towns by the imperial household but given the jockeying by various towns (Nicaea and Nicomedia come to mind) for honors such as the neokoros designation, I do not think the concept is that far fetched. Certainly the stationing of an army can drive up coin production (see Second Punic War in Spain) but I also suspect something else was at work. I’ve added several new coins of Markianopolis and Nikopolis since that post but I’ll spare everyone except a link: [URL]https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=6295[/URL] Nick[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Marcianopolis AE
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...