A Little ASE Toning

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by CamaroDMD, Dec 26, 2016.

  1. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Interesting thread at Collectors Universe. So let me get this straight. I heard somewhere that PCGS has offered $XXXX to anyone who can come up with a process to remove "milk spots." Cannot say I've heard someone did. Yet, a poster claims he sent them some coins for conservation and they got rid of the spots w/no trace.

    I'd need to see it done to believe it. What I prefer to believe (I've heard this has occurred many times before but not at NCS or PCGS) is the spotted bullion coins were replaced with nice ones. That way, everyone is happy and it is great advertising
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    I was just pointing out that the milk spots (although probably not caused by the same process) are very commonplace on modern Canadian Proofs and occasionally found on ASEs.

    Thus, it could be possible that the mint used different cleaning processes throughout years that could have different effects on the coins appearance later on.. or .. Possibly a coin developed a milk spot and somebody attempted to remove it experimentally.
    (It was originally an afterthought on causes of ASE toning. I wasn't anticipating needing to support my opinion with references.)
     
    mikenoodle likes this.
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Where to start ? Normally I wouldn't even post in this thread, but because I was "asked", and because of what occurred in this thread, I'm going to. And it is yet another example of something I was trying to explain the other day.

    And I want it understood that I am not speaking as a moderator here, I'm speaking as a person, just another member of this forum trying to give you, all of you, what I think is some good advice.

    It started out with this -

    Now does anybody besides me see what's going on here ? And no, I'm not referring to the tempers flaring and hair bristling between members. I'm not talking about that. Well, in a way I kinda am, but not really. What I'm really talking about is WHY it happens. And that it is completely unjustified. Hear me out and I think you'll understand.

    It started out with Richie saying -
    "I wonder if the dipping resulted in an odd toning pattern, perhaps the dip wasn't fully removed at once or something."

    And then Insider replied with -
    "Dip stains from improper neutralization."
    And he continues with - "We all have a "right" to like what we like;"

    And Richie replies with - "You said we all have that right...you are correct." And - "I don't need you to tell me what I should like ...."

    Now does anybody here NOT see that the two are saying the same thing ? They are in complete agreement with each other. And yet the animosity in the rest of the message, and later messages, is pretty hard to miss.

    And it's all because of two things, 1, this comment -
    "That said, some astute collectors eventually learn what is considered attractive/acceptable to the "market" and modify their personal tastes."

    Now that statement is accurate, it is completely true. But yet it, coupled with the 2nd thing, Richie's apparent dislike for Insider, led to further animosity in the thread.

    And then there's this -

    Is there anybody here who does not see what that is ? I'll tell ya what I see, I see fuel being thrown on the fire. At the same time I also see a member, in a way, but not the right way in my opinion, saying just ignore it. But that isn't how ya do it, wording the comment that way just throws fuel on the fire. And why was the comment made that way ? Apparently, because of Mike's dislike for Insider.

    Now, all of this said, 90% of what Insider and Richie both said - they are in complete agreement with each other. I really don't think that can be disputed. And yet the animosity from these posts fairly drips off the words ! And all because Insider made a true and accurate statement, but he threw an elbow jab to the ribs at the same time he made it.

    So who's at fault here ? Everybody is, there can be no doubt of that. But it's all over nothing !! Absolutely nothing.

    And what is the lesson to be learned ? Well I don't know any other way to say it - all of you, get over yourselves ! Each and every one of you, and I'm not just talking to Insider, Richie, and Mike here - I'm talking to everybody on this forum - you're all better than that. All of you know how to act, how to actually talk to people with civility.

    I mean c'mon ! Everybody in this thread AGREES ON 90% of what was said. But yet they go out of their way to make it hostile. There's no need to do that - none. You do it because you want to. So yeah, you all do need to learn how to read English. There was no animosity in the original comments - none. But yet a conscious choice was made to treat them as if there were. And that's where the responsibility lies for the senseless bickering that takes place. All of you quit trying to find fault with everything, quit looking for insults where there aren't any.

    Do that, and perhaps this will be a happier place.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    My apologies for being an ass.
     
  6. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Doug, I tend to agree with everything that you just said...except this statement:
    Contrary to how it may appear, I have no dislike for Insider (I know you said "apparent" and if that is how I appear than it is not as I have intended). It is true that I found his "elbow jab" mildly irritating...but I generally agree with the things he says and frankly he was the only person in this thread who actually agreed with my original assessment of the coin (at least initially...it seems you do too). Perhaps I jabbed back at him too harshly and if that is how it came out I sincerely apologize.

    CT is an interesting place with an interesting combination of personalities. I think numismatists in general tend to think of themselves as fairly intelligent people and often with that comes strong personalities. I have butted heads with a number of people here over the years...but I honestly can't think of anyone I actually dislike here. Heck...Doug, you and I have had our fair share of disagreements and you're one of my favorite people here.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  7. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    You should have been an ambassador. I plead guilty. Furthermore (you must know this Doug), I have no dislike for anyone here! I do have a caustic nature at times. :sorry:
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    For what it's worth, yeah I believe both of you. And yeah I already knew what both of you just said.

    Now that's what I'd call a good start ;) Let's see if we can't continue on down that road :)
     
  9. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    well, let me state for the record that I DO NOT dislike insider!

    I find his posts informative and his debate stimulating, I just wish he would be more polite when he does it, and as Richie stated, my strong personality and his strong personality have clashed when we should just work it out.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2016
    Paul M. likes this.
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    OK, GOOD ! Then how about everybody start acting that way :)

    Because guys, given what was written, it sure doesn't seem that way. And since each and every one of you KNOWS me, if it doesn't seem that way to me - then how can it seem that way to them ?

    Be the people I know all of you to be - the world will be a happier place !
     
  11. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Does anyone else feel like singing Kumbaya right about now?

    Doug, ever think of visiting the Middle East?
     
    Insider and Paul M. like this.
  12. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Richie,

    Just dug out my 2 ASE's that are in similar holders. Here is what I found.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    The 2009 looks nice IMO and I think I will leave it in it's holder for now. The 2000 is going to be removed from it holder and go into an airtite.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2016
    Paul M. likes this.
  13. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    That is identical to how mine looked. Same exact packaging and toning pattern. I just took it out of the holder on Sunday to put it in the new IS Album.
     
  14. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Sorry, fixed the rest of the images, photobucket and IE were not playing nice. :(
     
  15. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I have given up on photobucket...it's just too buggy. IMGUR seems to work much better for me.
     
    Paul M. and USS656 like this.
  16. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Well lookie what I just noticed. I just took this stack out of a tube and put it on the desk about 2-3 weeks go. It's already begun. A little dust build-up and some color starting...

    20161228_110809_HDR.jpg
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Only when I was asked to do so once upon a time. But that was in another life, or rather another period of my life. :)

    And yes, I am quite serious. And by the way, I refused.
     
  18. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Did you bring the gold, frankincense or myrrh?
     
    CamaroDMD and mikenoodle like this.
  19. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Nice!
     
  20. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    ROTFL !!

    Still gonna getcha for that ! :D
     
    Cascade likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page