Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="mikenoodle, post: 1902689, member: 307"]I agree with Kentucky. The article needs some thorough editing for grammar and punctuation. You also need to write differently from the way you speak. Your article is a bit too conversational. I also don't think I'd choose to link eBay for current prices. It's not the entire market. I'd remove the homework reference from the end. It points out that you cut and pasted it from your course, and that's not relevant here. Also irrelevant is the fact that you sold one for $76. Big deal. The reader may benefit from knowing that you sold yours and realized a profit by flipping it fast, but it sounds more like you're bragging than teaching me about the coins. Overall, I think it's a nice write up. I disagree with you on this point of your analysis: I think that the precious metal value of this coin will likely never be the primary driver of it's market price, but rather it's status as the first coin of it's kind (concave/convex) that will be at the root of the demand. This coin will always command a premium. I think you've underestimated the number of people who might be interested in these coins in the future. That said, I liked the article. I enjoy your enthusiasm. Keep writing![/QUOTE]