Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="johnmilton, post: 5332720, member: 101855"]The Early U.S. silver dollars have long been collector favorites. These large, impressive coins were one of the two flagship products (the $10 gold piece or “eagle” was the second) for the first United States Mint. They were exported to Europe, Asia and the Caribbean in the late 1790s and early 1800s. The export of those dollars prompted President Thomas Jefferson to suspend the coinage of the silver dollar in 1804 which brought a premature end to the series. [ATTACH=full]1225560[/ATTACH] The Spanish Milled Dollar or "piece of eight" was the inspiration for the early U.S. silver dollar.       The early U.S. dollars were inspired by the Spanish Milled Dollar or pieces of eight. Those Spanish colonial coins, which were minted in Mexico and South America, were a world currency. Many of those coins were a principle form of money in the American colonies prior to the Revolutionary War. They would continue to be one of the mainstays for domestic and world commerce after the United States won its independence. It was therefore not surprising that the first U.S. dollars were about the same size as the Spanish coin. The Spanish dollar would have legal tender status in the U.S. until 1857, almost until the outbreak of the American Civil War.       Like all of the early American Mint coinage, the silver dollar was authorized by the Coinage Act of 1792. That law specified that the dollar contained 371.25 grains of pure silver. This number was based upon a survey that treasury secretary, Alexander Hamilton, conducted of Spanish silver coins that were circulating in the United States in 1791. Hamilton set the total weight of the dollar at 416 grains.       The Coinage Act of 1792 required chief coiner, Henry Viogt, and assayer, Albion Cox, post bonds of $10,000 each. That was a huge sum at the time, and neither man was able to raise it, which delayed the coinage a silver and gold coins. The mint only issued copper coinage in 1793 and much of 1794. Ultimately Thomas Jefferson convinced Congress to lower the bonds and made arrangements for those two key mint officials to receive the necessary financial backing from wealthy individuals. Finally, the mint was able to issue the first American silver dollars in October 1794. The First Mint Scandal       Hamilton recommended and Congress agreed to set the composition alloy for the silver coinage at .8924 silver and .1076 copper. In the spring of 1794, before the mint had issued any silver coins, Chief Assayer, Albian Cox, asked Mint Director, David Rittenhouse, to allow him to increase the silver fineness to .900. This change would Cox’s job easier since the standard would be a round number. Cox absurdly argued that the silver coins produced with the slightly lower fineness would quickly turn black while in circulation. Surprisingly Rittenhouse bought into this point and agreed to this illegal change in the standards.  It would result the mint’s first major scandal.       Since the weight of the silver coins was reduced to reflect the higher percentage of silver, the resulting coins contained more silver than the law required. Therefore, those who deposited silver at the mint for coinage were routinely short changed with fewer coins that they should have received. My calculations indicate that depositors were shorted one dollar for every 118 dollars they received, in round numbers.       This illegal practice continued while David Rittenhouse and his temporary replacement, William de Saussure, were the Directors of the Mint. Neither Edmond Randolph, who had replaced Thomas Jefferson as secretary of state,<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a> nor President George Washington knew about the illegal mint policy. When Elias Boudinot took over as Mint Director on October 28, 1795, he was informed about the illegal .900 silver coin standard. He ordered an immediate halt to the practice and re-instated the legal standard.       When those who had deposited silver for coinage during this period learned about the scandal, they demanded redress. Chief among them was Philadelphia Merchant, John Vaughn, who claimed that he had been shorted $2,300, which was a considerable sum at the time.       The Treasury Department dragged its feet on compensating the depositors. Mint Director Boudinot made the argument that Vaughn had received all of his silver, which was true, but the director ignored that fact that Vaughn had gotten back fewer dollars than he was entitled to receive.  Finally, Congress voted to compensate Vaughn in 1800. The Congress did not get around to changing the standard to the more reasonable .900 silver, .100 copper alloy until 1837. [ATTACH=full]1225561[/ATTACH] Although this 1794 silver dollar grades Very Fine, there is weakness in the date and the legend on the reverse. The press that was used to strike this coin was too small and could exert enough pressure to bring up all of the details without a special effort. Fully struck 1794 dollars are known, included a piece that is graded SP-66, but those coins are quite rare. Photo courtesy Harry Laibstain Rare Coins The 1794 Silver Dollar       The 1794 silver dollar is one of the premier classic coins in the United States series. It was the first dollar struck at the Philadelphia Mint after it officially opened for business in February 1793. A great many collectors have had a strong interest in this piece for more than 150 years. According to Q. David Bowers<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a>, the value of a 1794 dollar in 1860 ranged from $13 in VG to $200 in Mint State. Those values have increased over the insuring decades. A piece graded SP-66 (Specimen or special strike) holds the record price paid for a single coin of $10,016,875.00. Each of the other certified Mint State examples have sold for more than a million dollars in recent years.       The obverse design features a bust of Ms. Liberty with her hair swept back from her face. The design is similar to the Pole to Cap design that appears on the early half cents and large cents without the liberty cap. The date is below the bust of Ms. Liberty and the word “LIBERTY” appears above her head. At the sides are 15 stars which corresponded with the number of states that were in the union at the time. Eight stars are on left and seven are on the right.       The reverse features a skinny eagle surrounded by a wreath. I have compared the appearance of this eagle with a pterodactyl or winged dinosaur. The legend, “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,” appears around the wreath.       There is no indication of the face value of the coin on the obverse or reverse. The only mark of value is around the edge. It reads, “hundred cents one dollar or unit.” All of the early dollars are valued in this way. The world “DOLLAR” would not appear on the face of the dollar coin until the series was resumed in 1836.        The reported mintage for the 1794 dollar was 1,758 pieces which were delivered in October of that year. Today there are an estimated 150 survivors. That makes the 1794 dollar a very scarce coin, R-4, according to the Sheldon rarity scale (estimated 76 to 200 pieces known), but not a rare piece. Collectors who have the funds, and who are willing to pay the price, can be assured of having opportunities to purchase a 1794 dollar.       Many of the survivors are impaired, and a large number of pieces without problems are poorly struck. The largest coin press that was available at the first mint in the fall of 1794 and early 1795 was built to strike coins no larger than a half dollar. Almost all 1794 dollars show strike weaknesses on the left side of the obverse. Some coins are weakly stuck in other areas on both sides of the piece. Naturally these coins lost more sharpness as they were worn down in circulation.       Since 2015, auction prices for 1794 dollars have ranged from $129,250 in Fine, $146,875 in VF, $270,250 in EF, $910,625 in Ch AU and $2,820,000 in MS-64. Obviously the 1794 dollar is beyond the means of most collectors. As such most of us must be content to leave that spot in our date sets open. [ATTACH=full]1225565[/ATTACH] A 1795 Flowing Hair Type Silver Dollar [ATTACH=full]1225566[/ATTACH] A 1795 Draped Bust, Small Eagle Silver Dollar The 1795 Dollars       The 1795 dollars were made in two design types, the Flowing Hair and Draped Bust designs. The Flowing Hair coins were quite similar, but not identical to the 1794 dollars. In these years considerable hand work went into the making of coinage dies. Therefore the placement of the date, lettering and some minor design details, like the number of leaves in the wreath, varied. Major devices, such as the bust of Liberty and the eagle and wreath on the reverse were standardized to a point but were frequent adjusted and replaced in the early years of the mint.       The need for a new, larger coin press delayed the production of the silver dollar until May 1795. During the interim period, the mint concentrated upon the half dime and half dollar, making those two issues fairly common compared to other early U.S. silver coins. No copper coins were struck because Congress was pressuring the mint to get silver and gold coins into circulation. Finally, on May 6, the first delivery of silver dollars, 3,810 pieces, was made. Deliveries continued through out the summer and into the fall.       The mint introduced the Draped Bust design in the fall of 1795, probably in the urging of the new Mint Director, Elias Boudinot . This image of Ms. Liberty features an elegant bust of a lady with her dress draped over her shoulder. Her hair is tied back with a bow which gives it a stylish, well-kept appearance compared with the Flowing Hair design which looked more casual. The date, “LIBERTY” and stars are configured in the same way as Flowing Hair type. The eagle on the reverse appears to be young bird that just emerging into the world, much like the new United States of America. Mintages and Rarity       According to “The Red Book,” the mintage for the 1795 Flowing Hair dollar was 160,295 pieces. “Coin Facts,” a numismatic information site that the PCGS grading service maintains, estimates that there are 10,250 surviving examples. That calculates to a survival percentage of 6.4%, which seems too high.       David Bowers addressed the annual mintage issue in his two volume Silver Dollar encyclopedia. Bowers agrees that the total mintage for all years of 1,446,106 is accurate. The questions concern the reported annual mintages. The mintages reported in “The Red Book” are based upon the total deliveries of coins reported in a calendar year. Although the delivery numbers are accurate, the issue is, what were the dates on the coins when they were delivered? During the early days of the mint, budgets were low and the cost of making dies was high. Therefore, a change in the calendar year did not prompt the summary discarding of perfectly good coinage dies despite the fact that the law called for the date on a coin to match its year of issue.       In view of this, Bowers theorizes that the dies for the Flowing Hair dollars may have been used as late as 1798. None of this can be proven, and the mintage adjustment estimates are no more than educated guesses. As we shall see later, there are ongoing issues with the “official” mintage figures that appear in “The Red Book.” Bowers estimated that the actual mintage for the Flowing Hair dollars was 280,000 which would make the survival percentage 3.7%. That is more in line with the overall survival rates for the entire early dollar series.       Under the same assumptions, Bowers increased the mintage for the 1795 Braided Hair Dollar from 42,738 to 110,000. Given an estimate of 3,900 survivors, the survival rate falls from 9.1% to 3.5%. [ATTACH=full]1225567[/ATTACH] Adjustment Marks and Plugs       Planchet preparation was an imprecise science in the 1790s and early 1800s. Therefore each planchet had be weighed, before it was struck, to determine if it met the legal standard. Planchets that weighed too much were lightened by running a file over the surface and catching the resulting silver fragments in an leather apron. Some of these marks were obliterated when the coins were struck, but on a fair number of early gold and silver coins, these parallel lines show on the surface of the piece. These lines are called adjustment marks. Since they are a part of the minting process, they do not reduce the technical grade of piece, but they can reduce the market value if they are significant and make the coin unattractive.             Underweight planchets also had to be flagged. In all cases, except in 1794 and 1795, these planchets were melted and the planchet production process had to be repeated. In 1794 and 1795 a comparatively small number of silver dollars had a silver plug driven into the center of the planchet to increase the weight to the legal standard. An estimated 250, 1795 Flowing Hair dollars have a silver plug, which appears in the center of the piece. These coins command premium prices. [ATTACH=full]1225568[/ATTACH] 1796 Dollars       The year 1796 was a unique one for the first Philadelphia Mint. It is only year in during which the facility struck all ten denominations that were authorized by the Coinage Act of 1792. Some of those coins, such as the half cent, half dollar and quarter eagle are rare and expensive. Still that has not discouraged several collectors from trying to form year sets or even “Proof sets” of exceptional quality 1796 coins.       The 1796 dollars are moderately scarce with estimated surviving population of 3,200 pieces. The reported mintage is 79,920. The Bowers estimate is close to that at 75,000. There are “Red Book” varieties with small and large and letters and different star configurations in three combinations.       The half dollar mintage fell from 299,680 in 1795 to a combined total of 3,918 pieces for the years 1796 and 1797. This was the normal mintage pattern for half dollars during the early years of the first U.S. Mint. When silver dollars were not available, the depositors asked for half dollars. When silver dollar production went back on line, the depositors order far fewer half dollars. When the coinage of the silver dollar ended in 1804, half dollar production greatly increased. [ATTACH=full]1225569[/ATTACH] 1797 Dollars       With a reported mintage of 7,776 and an estimated number of surviving coins at 3,500 pieces, the official mintage for the 1797 dollars is clearly wrong. Dave Bowers has estimated that the actual mintage of 1797 dollars was 60,000. Many, if not all, of those coins were delivered in 1798.       “Red Book” varieties of 1797 dollars include pieces with large and small reverse lettering, and coins with either the 9 (right side) X 7 (left side) or 10 X 6 obverse star configurations. The variety with 9 X 7 stars and small letters on the reverse is a scare coin with only 350 survivors. [ATTACH=full]1225570[/ATTACH] 1798 Small Eagle Dollar [ATTACH=full]1225571[/ATTACH] 1798 Heraldic Eagle Dollar 1798 Dollars       There were two reverse designs issued in 1798. At the beginning of the year, the Small Eagle, introduced in 1795, appeared on the reverse. Later in the year, a Heraldic Eagle, similar to the one in the Great Seal of the United States, replaced it. “The Red Book” only provides a combined mintage for the two types of 327,536 coins. Dave Bowers has estimated that the combined mintage was lower and split the total at 35,000 for the Small Eagle reverse and 200,000 for the Heraldic Eagle coins.       The Small Eagle variety is a scarce coin with an estimated 1,350 survivors. There are two die varieties, one with 13 stars on the obverse and second with 15 stars.<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/file:///C:/Users/Carol%20and%20Bill/Documents/Brandon%20Coin%20Club/2019%20Articles/2019%20Used%20Articles/Early%20Silver%20Dollars.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a> The 15 star coin with an estimated 500 survivors is scarcer.       There are number of varieties of the Heraldic Eagle type. There are “9”s with and without a knob on the point of the figure. There are differences in the number vertical stripes in the vertical lines on the shield on the reverse. Some of these sub varieties are very scarce, but there are plenty of examples of the common varieties to provide date collectors with a reasonably priced coin. Adding up all of the varieties listed in “Coin Facts,” the estimated number of survivors is 6,905. [ATTACH=full]1225574[/ATTACH] 1799 Dollars       The 1799 Bust Dollar is the most common date in the early dollar set. This is not surprising because the reports show that the dollar was the only silver coin the mint issued that year. David Bowers has lowered the mintage estimate from 423,515 to 395,000. Although there are a couple of scarce to rare varieties, there are many “generic” examples available for date collectors.       This marks the first year that mint created an overdate date, 1799 over 8, in the early dollar series. It must be assumed that those coins were struck in 1799. Mint procedures indicate that overdate dies are almost always those that had not been hardened or used to strike coins previously. Pre-hardened dies were still in the die preparation process, and therefore could be modified. [/QUOTE]

Create my FREE Account!

Log in or Sign up

Reply to Thread

Useful Searches