Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A group lot from CNG: Worth it?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 2897957, member: 81887"]I recently decided to take a chance and bid on a group lot in a CNG auction. Here's the photo and description from the sale (CNG Auction 408, lot 811):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]697481[/ATTACH] </p><p><b>MIXED. Greek to Central Asian. <i>Lot of fourteen (14) AR and Æ denominations.</i> </b>Includes: A broad range of eastern, mostly Parthian types (8 coins), but a couple of Shahpur I Æ issues included. Lot includes an AR obol of Eukratides I and an AR drachm of Ardaxšīr (Ardashir) III, as well as a Gandhara issue. Lot also includes an Æ of Mithradates I Kallinikos of Commagene. Coins Fair to VF, some roughness. Commagene coin ex CNG E-294, lot 201. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Fourteen (14) coins in lot.</p><p><br /></p><p>The estimate was $200, and I won with a final bid of $320. The main coins driving my interest were the Ardashir III drachm, the Eukratides obol, and one of the Parthian coins visible in the photo. So, how did I do? Here's photos of all 14 coins, with my preliminary IDs and impressions.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]697482[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]697483[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>1. Sasanian, Ardashir III (628-630), AR drachm. Year 2, mintmark seems to be AY (Airan-Khurra-Shahpur or Susa). Decent late Sasanian silver.</p><p>2. and 3. Sasanian, Shahpur I, AE. The larger coin has rather porous surfaces, but I quite like the smaller coin.</p><p>4. Parthian, Mithradates II. Reverse shows a horse, a very popular Parthian bronze type. Slightly rough surfaces, but decent for Parthian bronze.</p><p>5. Gandharan. I know basically nothing about this coin, but it looks cool, I will have to do some research.</p><p>6. Parthian, Artabanos II (or the similar Artabanos II or Gotarzes II). I've seen that reverse type before but can't remember what it is.</p><p>7. Parthian, Phraates IV, horse.</p><p>8. Parthian, looks like Phraates II. A scarcer early Parthian bronze.</p><p>9. Bactria, Eukratides I, AR obol. A beautiful little gem of a coin, clearly a highlight of the lot.</p><p>10. Commagene, Mithradates I Kallinikos. I looked up its previous appearance in a CNG sale, and at that time it looked like this:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]697489[/ATTACH] </p><p>It is clearly the same coin, but something bad has happened to it since then, perhaps an ill-advised attempt at cleaning. The surface is definitely more porous than it was in the old photograph, and much of the reverse detail is missing. In its previous sale, it sold for $130 (!), but in its current appearance, I would never have bought it alone.</p><p>11. Parthian, Phraates II. The green stuff seems to be solid encrustation, not bronze disease. A rather ugly coin.</p><p>12. and 13. Parthian, with Tyche on the reverse. Bronzes of this type were issued by several kings, it may be tough to attribute these to a specific ruler. As usual, these types show evidence of the blanks being cast in a strip.</p><p>14. Parthian, Phraates III, horse reverse with Mithradatkart mintmark. This obverse type, Sellwood 38, is one of my favorite Parthian designs (see my avatar) and this is a nice bronze example.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, how did I do? I'd estimate the combined retail value of these coins to be higher than what I paid, so on that basis it's a win but not the steal of the century. There are only two coins (#10 and 11) out of 14 that I find ugly and not worth owning, the rest are mostly bread-and-butter decent coins with a few real winners. Based on this experience, I would consider bidding on future CNG large lots if I can make out a few nice target coins in the photographs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 2897957, member: 81887"]I recently decided to take a chance and bid on a group lot in a CNG auction. Here's the photo and description from the sale (CNG Auction 408, lot 811): [ATTACH=full]697481[/ATTACH] [B]MIXED. Greek to Central Asian. [I]Lot of fourteen (14) AR and Æ denominations.[/I] [/B]Includes: A broad range of eastern, mostly Parthian types (8 coins), but a couple of Shahpur I Æ issues included. Lot includes an AR obol of Eukratides I and an AR drachm of Ardaxšīr (Ardashir) III, as well as a Gandhara issue. Lot also includes an Æ of Mithradates I Kallinikos of Commagene. Coins Fair to VF, some roughness. Commagene coin ex CNG E-294, lot 201. LOT SOLD AS IS, NO RETURNS. Fourteen (14) coins in lot. The estimate was $200, and I won with a final bid of $320. The main coins driving my interest were the Ardashir III drachm, the Eukratides obol, and one of the Parthian coins visible in the photo. So, how did I do? Here's photos of all 14 coins, with my preliminary IDs and impressions. [ATTACH=full]697482[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]697483[/ATTACH] 1. Sasanian, Ardashir III (628-630), AR drachm. Year 2, mintmark seems to be AY (Airan-Khurra-Shahpur or Susa). Decent late Sasanian silver. 2. and 3. Sasanian, Shahpur I, AE. The larger coin has rather porous surfaces, but I quite like the smaller coin. 4. Parthian, Mithradates II. Reverse shows a horse, a very popular Parthian bronze type. Slightly rough surfaces, but decent for Parthian bronze. 5. Gandharan. I know basically nothing about this coin, but it looks cool, I will have to do some research. 6. Parthian, Artabanos II (or the similar Artabanos II or Gotarzes II). I've seen that reverse type before but can't remember what it is. 7. Parthian, Phraates IV, horse. 8. Parthian, looks like Phraates II. A scarcer early Parthian bronze. 9. Bactria, Eukratides I, AR obol. A beautiful little gem of a coin, clearly a highlight of the lot. 10. Commagene, Mithradates I Kallinikos. I looked up its previous appearance in a CNG sale, and at that time it looked like this: [ATTACH=full]697489[/ATTACH] It is clearly the same coin, but something bad has happened to it since then, perhaps an ill-advised attempt at cleaning. The surface is definitely more porous than it was in the old photograph, and much of the reverse detail is missing. In its previous sale, it sold for $130 (!), but in its current appearance, I would never have bought it alone. 11. Parthian, Phraates II. The green stuff seems to be solid encrustation, not bronze disease. A rather ugly coin. 12. and 13. Parthian, with Tyche on the reverse. Bronzes of this type were issued by several kings, it may be tough to attribute these to a specific ruler. As usual, these types show evidence of the blanks being cast in a strip. 14. Parthian, Phraates III, horse reverse with Mithradatkart mintmark. This obverse type, Sellwood 38, is one of my favorite Parthian designs (see my avatar) and this is a nice bronze example. So, how did I do? I'd estimate the combined retail value of these coins to be higher than what I paid, so on that basis it's a win but not the steal of the century. There are only two coins (#10 and 11) out of 14 that I find ugly and not worth owning, the rest are mostly bread-and-butter decent coins with a few real winners. Based on this experience, I would consider bidding on future CNG large lots if I can make out a few nice target coins in the photographs.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A group lot from CNG: Worth it?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...