Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A game for ancient coin fans
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1005376, member: 19463"]I agree with Gao. If you can get a named Vetranio for under $100, it doesn't have to be perfect. I paid $85 for this one in 1996 and was happy to get it. There are many nicer than this but I still believe it is worth twice the others shown here. A and D are both premium rulers for their series and worth at least double the ordinary ones but so few people care that you might get them for less. A is one of the few Shahi coins which has the name of the ruler rather than just titles so I wanted it even at $20 while the same quality in other Shahi types might be $10. I'd not call D a Chola even though the type was derived from earlier Chola types. I considered B good because I could make out all of the marks and it is not the most common one so it was worth at least the $7 I paid which is more than I'll say about some of these punchmarked items. I thought I was cheap but even I was willing to pay $7 each for F and G. F is pretty and rated R1 in RIC so maybe it is worth more than average. There are few people who still pay extra for things RIC called R5 even though we all know that those ratings are very faulted. G is an R5 but not terribly attractive so I consider it about equal in value to the prettier and less rare F.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1005376, member: 19463"]I agree with Gao. If you can get a named Vetranio for under $100, it doesn't have to be perfect. I paid $85 for this one in 1996 and was happy to get it. There are many nicer than this but I still believe it is worth twice the others shown here. A and D are both premium rulers for their series and worth at least double the ordinary ones but so few people care that you might get them for less. A is one of the few Shahi coins which has the name of the ruler rather than just titles so I wanted it even at $20 while the same quality in other Shahi types might be $10. I'd not call D a Chola even though the type was derived from earlier Chola types. I considered B good because I could make out all of the marks and it is not the most common one so it was worth at least the $7 I paid which is more than I'll say about some of these punchmarked items. I thought I was cheap but even I was willing to pay $7 each for F and G. F is pretty and rated R1 in RIC so maybe it is worth more than average. There are few people who still pay extra for things RIC called R5 even though we all know that those ratings are very faulted. G is an R5 but not terribly attractive so I consider it about equal in value to the prettier and less rare F.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A game for ancient coin fans
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...