Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 8329570, member: 37839&quot;]I knew it was a 65 originally.&nbsp; I agree with near monster toning.&nbsp; Once again, I don’t see the 65 grade.&nbsp; It is much cleaner than that, and as I previously said, 66 made sense (given the strict grade on 1881s coins).&nbsp; It is unfortunate, as an NGC 65* with that degree of near monster toning would sell for a lot—probably thousands.&nbsp; PCGS definitely screwed you with an insane grade, and offered nothing in the way of recognition for eye appeal.&nbsp; It will still sell well, as that coin has extremely nice reverse toning.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in