Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A few tougher date/variety Seated Halves
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="okbustchaser, post: 2142203, member: 72642"]No, you have the only one attributed as WB-102. The 1867-S WB-102 die marriage, while certainly not common is not all that rare, either. There are several in PCGS holders--just not attributed as such.</p><p><br /></p><p>A lot of this comes from the fact that for most of PCGS's existence they didn't offer WB attributions. Others come simply from submitters simply not asking (paying) for attribution.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="okbustchaser, post: 2142203, member: 72642"]No, you have the only one attributed as WB-102. The 1867-S WB-102 die marriage, while certainly not common is not all that rare, either. There are several in PCGS holders--just not attributed as such. A lot of this comes from the fact that for most of PCGS's existence they didn't offer WB attributions. Others come simply from submitters simply not asking (paying) for attribution.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A few tougher date/variety Seated Halves
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...