Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 8637788, member: 19165&quot;]Good job! </p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s my additions/changes to your thoughts: </p><p><br /></p><p>1949S - The weakness to the left of the bell crack means no FBL. While there are several marks on the coin, there aren&#039;t too many major ones. Eye appeal is excellent. I&#039;d give this a 64 (no FBL)</p><p><br /></p><p>52S - I pretty much agree with what you said. 64. </p><p><br /></p><p>54S - This is probably the nicest one you&#039;ve shown so far. I don&#039;t like the mark in the obverse right field, but I&#039;ve seen worse on a 65. The rest of the coin looks quite nice overall. As for FBL - PCGS only uses the bottom set of bell lines, NGC uses both sets. This would get FBL at PCGS, but probably not at NGC. So, I&#039;d probably call this one 65 FBL if you sent it to PCGS.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in