Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A FEL TEMP type I didn't have
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2361532, member: 19463"]Here I go being disagreeable again but:</p><p>Rome mint RIC 313 is the legend FEL TEMP REPARATIO around a large M with dots across its angles. It is shown on RIC vol VIII plate 11 and is noted in the text as being in two public collections (Copenhagen and Oxford). The plate coin is the Copenhagen specimen. I have not seen the photo of the Oxford (Ashmolean) example but assume it is lower grade or the British authors of RIC probably would have used it. I have never seen one offered for sale. It is very hard to search since 313 is a big year in Roman history so RIC 313 gathers bad hits. Adding words like Constantius and Rome and M do little either. When you uncleaned fanatics find one in your lot of crusties, let me know. </p><p><br /></p><p>In this case, I suspect that the M means the same thing as the M placed in the field of FH coins about that time by most mints. I do not know of a Rome mint M in field but I do have the one here (RIC 316) with an M following the R and before the officina letter in the mintmark. One theory is that 1000 (M in Roman numerals) were valued at one solidus. Not everyone agrees with that but I'm waiting for a better answer.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]481764[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2361532, member: 19463"]Here I go being disagreeable again but: Rome mint RIC 313 is the legend FEL TEMP REPARATIO around a large M with dots across its angles. It is shown on RIC vol VIII plate 11 and is noted in the text as being in two public collections (Copenhagen and Oxford). The plate coin is the Copenhagen specimen. I have not seen the photo of the Oxford (Ashmolean) example but assume it is lower grade or the British authors of RIC probably would have used it. I have never seen one offered for sale. It is very hard to search since 313 is a big year in Roman history so RIC 313 gathers bad hits. Adding words like Constantius and Rome and M do little either. When you uncleaned fanatics find one in your lot of crusties, let me know. In this case, I suspect that the M means the same thing as the M placed in the field of FH coins about that time by most mints. I do not know of a Rome mint M in field but I do have the one here (RIC 316) with an M following the R and before the officina letter in the mintmark. One theory is that 1000 (M in Roman numerals) were valued at one solidus. Not everyone agrees with that but I'm waiting for a better answer. [ATTACH=full]481764[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A FEL TEMP type I didn't have
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...