Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A different Domitian / Minerva denarius
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Orfew, post: 3580372, member: 74968"][USER=76194]@Sallent[/USER] </p><p><br /></p><p>That is a very nice coin. It is RIC 657 and is marked (R) for rare. You are correct about the imperial acclamations. In 88 to 89 CE they were being awarded at a ferocious pace because of intense military activity. Your coin was struck sometime between the 14th of September 88 to September 13th of 89 CE. According to RIC we do know that IMP XVII was awarded before the 7th of November of 88 CE. According to the hoard evidence cited by RIC we can narrow this down to perhaps the 38 days between November 3rd and December 10 of 88 CE. This calculation greatly depends on the assumption of "regular output" and is based on the surviving coins in the hoards surveyed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Having said that, I can see why you were attracted to this coin. The portrait is great. I love the portraits on the Domitian denarii of 88 CE. They have an excellent style. This coin is also quite scarce. Good eye [USER=76194]@Sallent[/USER] and congratulations on a very nice purchase.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is the British Museum example. Note the excellent style of the portrait. Still I like the charm of yours more than the British Museum example.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]955225[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Orfew, post: 3580372, member: 74968"][USER=76194]@Sallent[/USER] That is a very nice coin. It is RIC 657 and is marked (R) for rare. You are correct about the imperial acclamations. In 88 to 89 CE they were being awarded at a ferocious pace because of intense military activity. Your coin was struck sometime between the 14th of September 88 to September 13th of 89 CE. According to RIC we do know that IMP XVII was awarded before the 7th of November of 88 CE. According to the hoard evidence cited by RIC we can narrow this down to perhaps the 38 days between November 3rd and December 10 of 88 CE. This calculation greatly depends on the assumption of "regular output" and is based on the surviving coins in the hoards surveyed. Having said that, I can see why you were attracted to this coin. The portrait is great. I love the portraits on the Domitian denarii of 88 CE. They have an excellent style. This coin is also quite scarce. Good eye [USER=76194]@Sallent[/USER] and congratulations on a very nice purchase. Here is the British Museum example. Note the excellent style of the portrait. Still I like the charm of yours more than the British Museum example. [ATTACH=full]955225[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A different Domitian / Minerva denarius
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...