Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A denier of Jerusalem, possibly minted during the reign of Baldwin IV
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="seth77, post: 3898684, member: 56653"]Around the mid 1160s, the Holy Sepulchre complex, whose building began as early as the 1140s, during the reign of Queen Melisende of Jerusalem, is finished and then consecrated in 1167. The new building unifies the older basilicas and ancient structures, some of them dating back to 329/30, built by orders of Constantine at the pleas of his mother, who had been on pilgrimage there in the second half of the 320s. At its consecration, the new Crusader structure was as majestic and important as any European cathedral of the day, although arguably more complex, having to contend with all the history it tried to incorporate, and was the seat of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1027691[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3"><i>Remnants of the portico curtain of the Holy Sepulchre curia, embedded into later structures in the Christian Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City, dating to around 1160.</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The importance of this structure cannot be overstated, and in the wake of its service, King Amalric introduced a new coinage of the realm in the spring or summer of 1164, possibly to finance the expenses of his campaigns in Egypt. The new <i>denier </i>of Jerusalem had a distinct iconography, making use of a schematic image of the domed Rotonda of the Holy Sepulchre. This was a very modern and timely representation, coming from a king whose piety was referred to rather scarcely and only by friendly voices, such as William of Tyre. But Amalric was rather very interested in the revenue coming to his coffers from the <i>droit de monnoie</i>, as he was interested in everything relating to the rule of law and efficient administration. The clergy was not particularly affectionate towards him nor he towards it, as he exacted a toll for the secular participation even in the finalization of the Holy Sepulchre complex.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1027704[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3"><i>Offered by a German dealer, October 2019</i></font></p><p><font size="3"><i>AR18mm 0.80g denier of Jerusalem, possibly minted in the mid 1170s.</i></font></p><p><font size="3"><i>AMALRICVS RЄX o</i></font></p><p><font size="3"><i>+ DЄ IЄRVSALЄM</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p>The task of introducing a new coinage was no easy task, especially considering the fact that the Kingdom of Jerusalem already had a coin of the realm, which was quite successful, and which had been "just" introduced during the early part of the reign of Baldwin III around the mid 1140s.</p><p><br /></p><p>But very likely due to this impressive use of iconographic novelty and the evident importance of the church complex in the collective consciousness (next to the great quality of the billon used, sometimes as high as 700-800/1000 in silver title, cf. Kool - The Circulation and Use of Coins in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099-1291), the new <i>denier</i> of Amalric was a smashing hit. As a matter of fact it was so widely accepted and coveted, that it became immobilized after his death in 1174 and kept as the coinage of the realm until the reign of Guy de Lusignan, to be then revived during the reign of Aimery de Lusignan around 1200.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1027696[/ATTACH]<font size="3"><i> The descent of the Holy Fire through the Holy Sepulchre Rotonda (B. Vaticana cod. Urb. Lat. 1362) after an earlier (Venetian?) sketch from around 1200.</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p>The coins minted during the reign of Amalric are usually at around 1g of weight and 19mm diameter. Fluctuations in weight are very small and so are differences in billon quality. The <i>seigniorage </i>from the minting operation proved very useful and the coins themselves financed the Egyptian campaigns of 1164-1167, which culminated with the capture of Alexandria in the spring of 1167.</p><p><br /></p><p>The research of Robert Kool presents a sequencing of the type that allows us to date some particularities like weight margins, lettering and Rotonda details. Although the type was immobilized, small differences can be traced to different periods and administrations. Amalric died in 1174 and was followed by Baldwin IV "The Leper King," who was less of a legislator and administrator and more of a man of action. The new deniers of around 0.80g and 18mm of the mid 1170s do have some important fluctuations in billon title, which indicates less quality control and standardization. But mostly they continued to be a stable and reliable coinage, following the earlier standard.</p><p><br /></p><p>1176 to 1179 were mostly spent by the restless King Baldwin IV on the field of battle, among the likes of Reynald de Chatillon (the Prince of Oultrejourdain), Baldwin d'Ibelin (who was gaining importance as Lord of Ramla and the most active vassal in the south of the Kingdom), Humphrey de Toron (the Constable of Jerusalem) and the Templars. This period was marked by both the victory at Montgisard in November 1177, where Baldwin, Reynald and the Templar company achieved a great success against the odds, and by the losses of 1179, when between Banias and Marj Uyun, the Crusader force lost Humphrey who died on the field at Banias and the Templar Grand Master, Baldwin d'Ibelin and much of the knights of Tripoli, who were captured by Saladin.</p><p><br /></p><p>But the most important of Baldwin's losses is also one of the events that help us piece together the history of the Jerusalem coinage: the fall of the Chastellet at Vadum Iacob. This new fortification had been started in the autumn of 1178 as a royal project (paid for by the king) but by early 1179 it was passed to the Templars, which were involved in developing a more coherent defense policy, taking some of the burdens that the local limes barons had to contend with. The castle was extremely important strategically and a great liability for Saladin, as it dominated the Upper Jordan and the Damascus road at a distance of a day's ride from the city.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1027742[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3"><i>The location of the stronghold at Vadum Iacob.</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p>Saladin's whole incursion up to Marj Uyun was prompted by the need to eliminate the threat that a fully-built Templar stronghold at Vadum Iacob posed for Syria, by cutting off its supply lines. At the same time, building an adequate fortification while under constant duress and attacks by Saladin's troops was no easy task, and by the time it fell to Saladin in August 1179, it wasn't fully functional nor fully garisoned. Its destruction and the massacre of the Templar defenders was followed by a haste return to Damascus.</p><p><br /></p><p>What was left behind, the ruins at Ateret (as it is presently known), offers vast insights into both Crusader/Templar warfare and the economic and monetary life of the Kingdom of Jerusalem in the 1170s. The discovery in 1995 of 22 immobilized <i>deniers</i> of the "Holy Sepulchre dome type" added to our understanding of coin circulation in the late 1170s. On the basis of these finds, R. Kool of Israel Antiquity Authority was able to study a glimpse of the monetary mass available in 1179. The coins weigh generally under 1g to 0.80g, with 7 of them showing stylistic similarities -- double-barred A's and the "regular type A" dome -- with the coin presented here. They are all probably part of a series that was minted around mid 1170s and/or later, but not later than late 1178 or the summer of 1179, the terminus ante quem for the Chastellet fortification.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1027741[/ATTACH] <font size="3"><i>Chastellet at Vadum Iacob towering the ancient road to Damascus.</i></font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>1180 marks the beginning of the decline of the Latin Kingdom, along the gradual but fast deterioration of the "Leper King's" health. Much like his father Amalric, he died before having the chance to put the affairs of state in full order, and much like in 1174/5, in 1185 the reins of the Kingdom were handed by the <i>Haute Cour</i> to Raymond III de Tripoli as regent. But although we know from William of Tyre that Amalric could contemplate the possibility of death being the end, a thought that scared and guided him as king, there is not much we now about Baldwin's inner thoughts about his own mortality. He was almost 24 when he died.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="seth77, post: 3898684, member: 56653"]Around the mid 1160s, the Holy Sepulchre complex, whose building began as early as the 1140s, during the reign of Queen Melisende of Jerusalem, is finished and then consecrated in 1167. The new building unifies the older basilicas and ancient structures, some of them dating back to 329/30, built by orders of Constantine at the pleas of his mother, who had been on pilgrimage there in the second half of the 320s. At its consecration, the new Crusader structure was as majestic and important as any European cathedral of the day, although arguably more complex, having to contend with all the history it tried to incorporate, and was the seat of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem. [ATTACH=full]1027691[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3][I]Remnants of the portico curtain of the Holy Sepulchre curia, embedded into later structures in the Christian Quarter of Jerusalem's Old City, dating to around 1160.[/I][/SIZE] The importance of this structure cannot be overstated, and in the wake of its service, King Amalric introduced a new coinage of the realm in the spring or summer of 1164, possibly to finance the expenses of his campaigns in Egypt. The new [I]denier [/I]of Jerusalem had a distinct iconography, making use of a schematic image of the domed Rotonda of the Holy Sepulchre. This was a very modern and timely representation, coming from a king whose piety was referred to rather scarcely and only by friendly voices, such as William of Tyre. But Amalric was rather very interested in the revenue coming to his coffers from the [I]droit de monnoie[/I], as he was interested in everything relating to the rule of law and efficient administration. The clergy was not particularly affectionate towards him nor he towards it, as he exacted a toll for the secular participation even in the finalization of the Holy Sepulchre complex. [ATTACH=full]1027704[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3][I]Offered by a German dealer, October 2019[/I] [I]AR18mm 0.80g denier of Jerusalem, possibly minted in the mid 1170s.[/I] [I]AMALRICVS RЄX o[/I] [I]+ DЄ IЄRVSALЄM[/I][/SIZE] The task of introducing a new coinage was no easy task, especially considering the fact that the Kingdom of Jerusalem already had a coin of the realm, which was quite successful, and which had been "just" introduced during the early part of the reign of Baldwin III around the mid 1140s. But very likely due to this impressive use of iconographic novelty and the evident importance of the church complex in the collective consciousness (next to the great quality of the billon used, sometimes as high as 700-800/1000 in silver title, cf. Kool - The Circulation and Use of Coins in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099-1291), the new [I]denier[/I] of Amalric was a smashing hit. As a matter of fact it was so widely accepted and coveted, that it became immobilized after his death in 1174 and kept as the coinage of the realm until the reign of Guy de Lusignan, to be then revived during the reign of Aimery de Lusignan around 1200. [ATTACH=full]1027696[/ATTACH][SIZE=3][I] The descent of the Holy Fire through the Holy Sepulchre Rotonda (B. Vaticana cod. Urb. Lat. 1362) after an earlier (Venetian?) sketch from around 1200.[/I][/SIZE] The coins minted during the reign of Amalric are usually at around 1g of weight and 19mm diameter. Fluctuations in weight are very small and so are differences in billon quality. The [I]seigniorage [/I]from the minting operation proved very useful and the coins themselves financed the Egyptian campaigns of 1164-1167, which culminated with the capture of Alexandria in the spring of 1167. The research of Robert Kool presents a sequencing of the type that allows us to date some particularities like weight margins, lettering and Rotonda details. Although the type was immobilized, small differences can be traced to different periods and administrations. Amalric died in 1174 and was followed by Baldwin IV "The Leper King," who was less of a legislator and administrator and more of a man of action. The new deniers of around 0.80g and 18mm of the mid 1170s do have some important fluctuations in billon title, which indicates less quality control and standardization. But mostly they continued to be a stable and reliable coinage, following the earlier standard. 1176 to 1179 were mostly spent by the restless King Baldwin IV on the field of battle, among the likes of Reynald de Chatillon (the Prince of Oultrejourdain), Baldwin d'Ibelin (who was gaining importance as Lord of Ramla and the most active vassal in the south of the Kingdom), Humphrey de Toron (the Constable of Jerusalem) and the Templars. This period was marked by both the victory at Montgisard in November 1177, where Baldwin, Reynald and the Templar company achieved a great success against the odds, and by the losses of 1179, when between Banias and Marj Uyun, the Crusader force lost Humphrey who died on the field at Banias and the Templar Grand Master, Baldwin d'Ibelin and much of the knights of Tripoli, who were captured by Saladin. But the most important of Baldwin's losses is also one of the events that help us piece together the history of the Jerusalem coinage: the fall of the Chastellet at Vadum Iacob. This new fortification had been started in the autumn of 1178 as a royal project (paid for by the king) but by early 1179 it was passed to the Templars, which were involved in developing a more coherent defense policy, taking some of the burdens that the local limes barons had to contend with. The castle was extremely important strategically and a great liability for Saladin, as it dominated the Upper Jordan and the Damascus road at a distance of a day's ride from the city. [ATTACH=full]1027742[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3][I]The location of the stronghold at Vadum Iacob.[/I][/SIZE] Saladin's whole incursion up to Marj Uyun was prompted by the need to eliminate the threat that a fully-built Templar stronghold at Vadum Iacob posed for Syria, by cutting off its supply lines. At the same time, building an adequate fortification while under constant duress and attacks by Saladin's troops was no easy task, and by the time it fell to Saladin in August 1179, it wasn't fully functional nor fully garisoned. Its destruction and the massacre of the Templar defenders was followed by a haste return to Damascus. What was left behind, the ruins at Ateret (as it is presently known), offers vast insights into both Crusader/Templar warfare and the economic and monetary life of the Kingdom of Jerusalem in the 1170s. The discovery in 1995 of 22 immobilized [I]deniers[/I] of the "Holy Sepulchre dome type" added to our understanding of coin circulation in the late 1170s. On the basis of these finds, R. Kool of Israel Antiquity Authority was able to study a glimpse of the monetary mass available in 1179. The coins weigh generally under 1g to 0.80g, with 7 of them showing stylistic similarities -- double-barred A's and the "regular type A" dome -- with the coin presented here. They are all probably part of a series that was minted around mid 1170s and/or later, but not later than late 1178 or the summer of 1179, the terminus ante quem for the Chastellet fortification. [ATTACH=full]1027741[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3][I]Chastellet at Vadum Iacob towering the ancient road to Damascus.[/I][/SIZE] 1180 marks the beginning of the decline of the Latin Kingdom, along the gradual but fast deterioration of the "Leper King's" health. Much like his father Amalric, he died before having the chance to put the affairs of state in full order, and much like in 1174/5, in 1185 the reins of the Kingdom were handed by the [I]Haute Cour[/I] to Raymond III de Tripoli as regent. But although we know from William of Tyre that Amalric could contemplate the possibility of death being the end, a thought that scared and guided him as king, there is not much we now about Baldwin's inner thoughts about his own mortality. He was almost 24 when he died.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A denier of Jerusalem, possibly minted during the reign of Baldwin IV
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...