Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;David Atherton, post: 2920520, member: 82616&quot;]My latest acquisition is proof that even well catalogued numismatic periods still have many mysteries. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]707052[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Domitian</b></p><p>AR Denarius, 3.53g</p><p>Rome mint, 81 AD</p><p>RIC 26 (R). BMC spec. acquired 1987. RSC 63.</p><p>Obv: IMP CAES DOMITIANVS AVG P M; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r.</p><p>Rev: COS VII DES VIII P P; Dolphin coiled around anchor</p><p>Acquired from CGB, November 2017. Ex CGB Live Auction, 1 August 2017, lot brm_440753 (unsold).</p><p><br /></p><p>An interesting denarius from Domitian&#039;s Group 3 denarii, a carry-over type from Titus&#039; pulvinaria series. Curiously, the reverse legend lacks a TRP date (a title Domitian was awarded upon accession), yet it is matched with an obverse legend employed later in the year. This reverse legend is more appropriate chronologically paired with the early &#039;PONT&#039; obverse dies with which it also shares a link. RIC notes the chronology is not precise with these issues from 81 and they are grouped only for &#039;convenience&#039;. A possible explanation for such an odd legend pairing would be the mint workers continuing to use old reverse dies with newly engraved obverses. With that in mind, it is not surprising die links between Groups 2, 3, and 4 are known. Generally, denarii with the reverse legend lacking TRP are quite scarce - all of the types in the group have a frequency rating of rare or very rare. The dolphin and anchor reverse is probably the most common one in the issue.</p><p><br /></p><p>What also attracted me to the piece is the stylish &#039;pinched&#039; portrait, almost Julius Caesar like.</p><p><br /></p><p>Feel free to post your numismatic mysteries, riddles, or enigmas.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in