Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A curious case of confused coins for cataloguing
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Pavlos, post: 7614890, member: 96635"]You have a category of "Greek city states", but ofcourse after Alexander you start to get a lot of Hellenistic Kingdoms, they are not "city states" anymore. Perhaps you should categorise them as that "Hellenistic Kingdoms".</p><p><br /></p><p>Kingdoms such as Pontos and Cappadocia I count as Greek, or Hellenic (it is the same, but Greek is from Latin and Hellenic is what we Greeks call ourselves). They were very much Hellenised in all ways (language, culture, religion etc), and the kings had a mixture of Greek and Persian ancestry. So defintely Hellenistic Kingdoms.</p><p><br /></p><p>States such as Armenia, Parthia, Sophene, Characene etc do are partly Hellenised, but since their ancestry is not Greek at all (except here and there some marriages) and they kept their original tradition, these are more as you say "Hellenistic influenced states". I would separate them from the Hellenistic Kingdoms.</p><p><br /></p><p>Pseudo-Greek coins such as the posthumous Philip I tetradrachms struck under Roman authority, well there isn't a wrong answer for that. I put them with my Greek coins, but you can very well count them as a Provincial coin as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Pavlos, post: 7614890, member: 96635"]You have a category of "Greek city states", but ofcourse after Alexander you start to get a lot of Hellenistic Kingdoms, they are not "city states" anymore. Perhaps you should categorise them as that "Hellenistic Kingdoms". Kingdoms such as Pontos and Cappadocia I count as Greek, or Hellenic (it is the same, but Greek is from Latin and Hellenic is what we Greeks call ourselves). They were very much Hellenised in all ways (language, culture, religion etc), and the kings had a mixture of Greek and Persian ancestry. So defintely Hellenistic Kingdoms. States such as Armenia, Parthia, Sophene, Characene etc do are partly Hellenised, but since their ancestry is not Greek at all (except here and there some marriages) and they kept their original tradition, these are more as you say "Hellenistic influenced states". I would separate them from the Hellenistic Kingdoms. Pseudo-Greek coins such as the posthumous Philip I tetradrachms struck under Roman authority, well there isn't a wrong answer for that. I put them with my Greek coins, but you can very well count them as a Provincial coin as well.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A curious case of confused coins for cataloguing
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...