Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A couple of early large cents that would never get a straight grade from a TPG
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="johnmilton, post: 26223214, member: 101855"]Here are a couple of large cents in my "one cent per year, 1793 to date collection. I bought this 1796 Draped Bust cent knowing that it would never grade because of the scratch. Still I like it. I didn't feel like paying several thousand dollars for piece in holder that would not be any sharper than this one. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1674788[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I have owned the 1801 Three Errors large cent for about 40 years. I paid about $150 for it in an EAC auction. It's been cleaned but the three errors are really sharp. They are:</p><ul> <li>The engraver didn't add the stem to the left side of the wreath.</li> <li>The engraver punched the "U" in "UNITED" upside-down and then right-side up which made it look like "II." </li> <li>The fraction is the undefined or meaningless "1/000."</li> </ul><p>[ATTACH=full]1674789[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a close-up of the three errors. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1674790[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This reverse is paired with two obverse varieties. This is the more common one, which is somewhat scarce.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="johnmilton, post: 26223214, member: 101855"]Here are a couple of large cents in my "one cent per year, 1793 to date collection. I bought this 1796 Draped Bust cent knowing that it would never grade because of the scratch. Still I like it. I didn't feel like paying several thousand dollars for piece in holder that would not be any sharper than this one. [ATTACH=full]1674788[/ATTACH] I have owned the 1801 Three Errors large cent for about 40 years. I paid about $150 for it in an EAC auction. It's been cleaned but the three errors are really sharp. They are: [LIST] [*]The engraver didn't add the stem to the left side of the wreath. [*]The engraver punched the "U" in "UNITED" upside-down and then right-side up which made it look like "II." [*]The fraction is the undefined or meaningless "1/000." [/LIST] [ATTACH=full]1674789[/ATTACH] Here is a close-up of the three errors. [ATTACH=full]1674790[/ATTACH] This reverse is paired with two obverse varieties. This is the more common one, which is somewhat scarce.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A couple of early large cents that would never get a straight grade from a TPG
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...