Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A couple of atrocious 11th-c. feudal deniers
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 4966595, member: 74712"]Fascinating! It never occurred to me that Guy in the tapestry would have minted his own coins! I can add some Norman Deniers which <i>might </i>have been minted by William the conqueror, but we can’t know for certain. Here is my most recent purchase from Normandy:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1193720[/ATTACH] Feudal France - Normandy</p><p>William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130)</p><p>AR Denier, 17.41 mm x 0.7 grams</p><p>Obv.: +NORMANA. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</p><p>Rev.: Degenerate chapel, pellet in pediment, with four columns/comb, S above annulet on either side</p><p>Ref.: Dumas XX-4, Roberts 4835</p><p>Ex. Lilburn Collection, Ex. Baldwins sale 25 (26 Sept. 2006), part of lot 1984</p><p>Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard</p><p><br /></p><p>I have wanted this type for some time, and had only seen one for sale once before this one came available. The first one I saw was nicer, and hopefully a better example will come around to replace it. I am not sure why this one is so appealing to me - the columns of the chapel are just more distinctive than many of the other issues from Normandy, and they look kind of like the comb from Champagne (but I highly doubt there is any connection)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 4966595, member: 74712"]Fascinating! It never occurred to me that Guy in the tapestry would have minted his own coins! I can add some Norman Deniers which [I]might [/I]have been minted by William the conqueror, but we can’t know for certain. Here is my most recent purchase from Normandy: [ATTACH=full]1193720[/ATTACH] Feudal France - Normandy William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130) AR Denier, 17.41 mm x 0.7 grams Obv.: +NORMANA. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: Degenerate chapel, pellet in pediment, with four columns/comb, S above annulet on either side Ref.: Dumas XX-4, Roberts 4835 Ex. Lilburn Collection, Ex. Baldwins sale 25 (26 Sept. 2006), part of lot 1984 Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard I have wanted this type for some time, and had only seen one for sale once before this one came available. The first one I saw was nicer, and hopefully a better example will come around to replace it. I am not sure why this one is so appealing to me - the columns of the chapel are just more distinctive than many of the other issues from Normandy, and they look kind of like the comb from Champagne (but I highly doubt there is any connection)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A couple of atrocious 11th-c. feudal deniers
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...