Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A 'chain' of collecting
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 8210528, member: 85693"]Here's a couple of baffling (to me anyway!) overstrikes from a hot mess lot from eBay, with my efforts to attribute. Byzantine QC at its worst. The first one may be Heraclius over Maurice Tiberius, or over another Heraclius. Weird retrograde lettering, it seems - I tried! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie87" alt=":sorry:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1440321[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's the reverse with enhancements:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1440322[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Heraclius? Æ Follis</b></p><p><b>Year 1-3 (610-613 A.D.)? </b></p><p><b>Constantinople Mint</b></p><p>[hRACLIVS PeRP AVG], crowned and cuirassed bust facing, bearded, [holding cross</p><p>on globe and shield] / Large M, ANNO right (should be left; or undertype?), cross above...?</p><p>SB 804 ?</p><p>(5.25 grams / 28 x 17 mm)</p><p>eBay Oct. 2020 Lot @ $3.54</p><p><b>Overstrike: </b>Coin is difficult to interpret; possibly twice overstruck with rev./obv. orientation?</p><p>Maurice Tiberius (?) follis, chi-rho visible above the M, Γ and CON retrograde.</p><p>SB 495?</p><p>Possibly another Heraclius?</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's another one - Constans II overstruck on a Heraclius, but the Heraclius is actually easier to make out. I think so, anyway <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie10" alt=":oops:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1440325[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>With enhancements; the Constans II overtype is colored blue. Note that it is fainter than the undertype, but since Constans II came after Heraclius, it has to be the overstrike <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1440326[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Constans II Æ Follis</b></p><p><b>n.d. (c. 641-644 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Constantinople Mint</b></p><p>[ЄNTO VTO] NIK[A], Constans beardless standing facing with long cross and cross on globe / [large m, ANA left, cross above, N]ЄOS right, [I II or III below].</p><p>SB 1000; DOC 59d / Class 1</p><p>(4.23 grams / 22 mm)</p><p>eBay Oct. 2020 Lot @ $3.54</p><p><b>Overstrike: </b></p><p>Weakly overstruck rev./obv. on Heraclius Constantinople follis</p><p>Year 1-3 (610-613 A.D.):</p><p>dNhR[ACLIVS PeRP AVG], crowned and cuirassed bust facing, bearded, holding cross on globe and shield / Large M, ANN[O] left, cross above, [date I, II or III right], Officina Γ, [CON in ex.]</p><p>SB 804; MIB 158.</p><p><b>Note:</b> Details of undertype are more visible than overstrike!</p><p><br /></p><p>Any corrections or suggestions, as always, much appreciated.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 8210528, member: 85693"]Here's a couple of baffling (to me anyway!) overstrikes from a hot mess lot from eBay, with my efforts to attribute. Byzantine QC at its worst. The first one may be Heraclius over Maurice Tiberius, or over another Heraclius. Weird retrograde lettering, it seems - I tried! :sorry: [ATTACH=full]1440321[/ATTACH] Here's the reverse with enhancements: [ATTACH=full]1440322[/ATTACH] [B]Heraclius? Æ Follis Year 1-3 (610-613 A.D.)? Constantinople Mint[/B] [hRACLIVS PeRP AVG], crowned and cuirassed bust facing, bearded, [holding cross on globe and shield] / Large M, ANNO right (should be left; or undertype?), cross above...? SB 804 ? (5.25 grams / 28 x 17 mm) eBay Oct. 2020 Lot @ $3.54 [B]Overstrike: [/B]Coin is difficult to interpret; possibly twice overstruck with rev./obv. orientation? Maurice Tiberius (?) follis, chi-rho visible above the M, Γ and CON retrograde. SB 495? Possibly another Heraclius? Here's another one - Constans II overstruck on a Heraclius, but the Heraclius is actually easier to make out. I think so, anyway :oops: [ATTACH=full]1440325[/ATTACH] With enhancements; the Constans II overtype is colored blue. Note that it is fainter than the undertype, but since Constans II came after Heraclius, it has to be the overstrike o_O: [ATTACH=full]1440326[/ATTACH] [B]Constans II Æ Follis n.d. (c. 641-644 A.D.) Constantinople Mint[/B] [ЄNTO VTO] NIK[A], Constans beardless standing facing with long cross and cross on globe / [large m, ANA left, cross above, N]ЄOS right, [I II or III below]. SB 1000; DOC 59d / Class 1 (4.23 grams / 22 mm) eBay Oct. 2020 Lot @ $3.54 [B]Overstrike: [/B] Weakly overstruck rev./obv. on Heraclius Constantinople follis Year 1-3 (610-613 A.D.): dNhR[ACLIVS PeRP AVG], crowned and cuirassed bust facing, bearded, holding cross on globe and shield / Large M, ANN[O] left, cross above, [date I, II or III right], Officina Γ, [CON in ex.] SB 804; MIB 158. [B]Note:[/B] Details of undertype are more visible than overstrike! Any corrections or suggestions, as always, much appreciated.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A 'chain' of collecting
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...