Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A 'chain' of collecting
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8209903, member: 19463"]Quite a few of my coins have been purchased not entirely on their own merits but because they seemed to add interest or clarity to another coin I already had. Recently, Valentinian posted a thread on a follis of Constantine VII.</p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/byzantine-emperor-constantine-vii-913-959.392854/#post-8206373" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/byzantine-emperor-constantine-vii-913-959.392854/#post-8206373">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/byzantine-emperor-constantine-vii-913-959.392854/#post-8206373</a></p><p>To this thread I posted my similar coin that was overstruck on a coin of Romanus I.</p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/rz0460bb0704-jpg.1437918/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>That pointed out to me that I did not have a coin of Romanus I that was not 'erased' by overstriking so I went looking not expecting to find anything even remotely in my price bracket. A VCoins dealer (David Connors) had several of these very common coins including one that I considered appropriately priced that showed two features I required for this 'chain'. My coin above shows the large globus crucifer of the undertype which is larger on this type than on most coins with this device so I wanted one with a very clear globe. Oddly, but especially appealing for some reason, this new coin was poorly struck missing the part of the Romanus legend (+RW) that was clear on my overstruck example on both sides. I can only assume that this uneven strike was the reason that my new coin was priced lower than all but one of the other Romanus folles he had. Most of the others were weaker on the globus crucifer but had other strengths that meant nothing to me. I ordered the coin and the combination of great service from Mr. Connors, great service from the post office and dumb luck placed the coin below in my mailbox today. I was not really planning to buy any coins but this one asked politely and was adopted. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1440112[/ATTACH]</p><p>If you did not post yours in the earlier thread, feel free to show yours here. I really like having overstruck coins and coins that are 'linked' to them that show clearly what the overstrike made less clear. Does anyone else seek out such pairs?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8209903, member: 19463"]Quite a few of my coins have been purchased not entirely on their own merits but because they seemed to add interest or clarity to another coin I already had. Recently, Valentinian posted a thread on a follis of Constantine VII. [URL]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/byzantine-emperor-constantine-vii-913-959.392854/#post-8206373[/URL] To this thread I posted my similar coin that was overstruck on a coin of Romanus I. [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/rz0460bb0704-jpg.1437918/[/IMG] That pointed out to me that I did not have a coin of Romanus I that was not 'erased' by overstriking so I went looking not expecting to find anything even remotely in my price bracket. A VCoins dealer (David Connors) had several of these very common coins including one that I considered appropriately priced that showed two features I required for this 'chain'. My coin above shows the large globus crucifer of the undertype which is larger on this type than on most coins with this device so I wanted one with a very clear globe. Oddly, but especially appealing for some reason, this new coin was poorly struck missing the part of the Romanus legend (+RW) that was clear on my overstruck example on both sides. I can only assume that this uneven strike was the reason that my new coin was priced lower than all but one of the other Romanus folles he had. Most of the others were weaker on the globus crucifer but had other strengths that meant nothing to me. I ordered the coin and the combination of great service from Mr. Connors, great service from the post office and dumb luck placed the coin below in my mailbox today. I was not really planning to buy any coins but this one asked politely and was adopted. [ATTACH=full]1440112[/ATTACH] If you did not post yours in the earlier thread, feel free to show yours here. I really like having overstruck coins and coins that are 'linked' to them that show clearly what the overstrike made less clear. Does anyone else seek out such pairs?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A 'chain' of collecting
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...