Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A "C·AL" denarius without the moneyer's name
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="red_spork, post: 2678286, member: 74282"]Most of the coins on my bid list in the most recent Naville auction went a bit(or a lot) higher than I expected, but I was happy to see after the dust settled that I'd won the following lot: a fully anonymous variant of the <a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156641&partId=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156641&partId=1" rel="nofollow">"C·AL" denarius</a> from a Second Punic War-era Sicilian mint. Crawford argues that there were at least two such mints on Sicily operating in parallel but in a different style as can be seen on <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3332897" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3332897" rel="nofollow">this coin attributed to the other Sicilian mint</a> and both mints issued signed and fully-anonymous types. While both types share the visor style with three parallel lines(which only occurs on Sicilian types), the horn sticking out of the back of the helmet on the other type is an easy way to differentiate the two. Given the amount of fighting that the island of Sicily saw during the war, it's no real surprise that the Romans likely needed an immense amount of coinage and consequently may have needed multiple mints to keep up with demand.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]598012[/ATTACH]</p><p>Roman Republic AR Denarius(19.5mm., 4.35g), anonymous(related to C·AL series), 209-208 B.C., Sicilian mint. Helmeted head of Roma right with loop beneath visor; behind, X / The Dioscuri galloping right; below, ROMA in linear frame. Crawford 75/1c; Sydenham 191a; Russo RBW 321</p><p><br /></p><p>For anyone interested in reading more about these fully anonymous types I'd like to point out <a href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/" rel="nofollow">the excellent guide</a> by Steve Brinkman and Pierluigi Debernardi, to whom I owe a great deal of gratitude for providing a lot of great information on these complicated types</p><p><br /></p><p>Please share anything relevant![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="red_spork, post: 2678286, member: 74282"]Most of the coins on my bid list in the most recent Naville auction went a bit(or a lot) higher than I expected, but I was happy to see after the dust settled that I'd won the following lot: a fully anonymous variant of the [URL='http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156641&partId=1']"C·AL" denarius[/URL] from a Second Punic War-era Sicilian mint. Crawford argues that there were at least two such mints on Sicily operating in parallel but in a different style as can be seen on [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3332897']this coin attributed to the other Sicilian mint[/URL] and both mints issued signed and fully-anonymous types. While both types share the visor style with three parallel lines(which only occurs on Sicilian types), the horn sticking out of the back of the helmet on the other type is an easy way to differentiate the two. Given the amount of fighting that the island of Sicily saw during the war, it's no real surprise that the Romans likely needed an immense amount of coinage and consequently may have needed multiple mints to keep up with demand. [ATTACH=full]598012[/ATTACH] Roman Republic AR Denarius(19.5mm., 4.35g), anonymous(related to C·AL series), 209-208 B.C., Sicilian mint. Helmeted head of Roma right with loop beneath visor; behind, X / The Dioscuri galloping right; below, ROMA in linear frame. Crawford 75/1c; Sydenham 191a; Russo RBW 321 For anyone interested in reading more about these fully anonymous types I'd like to point out [URL='http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/']the excellent guide[/URL] by Steve Brinkman and Pierluigi Debernardi, to whom I owe a great deal of gratitude for providing a lot of great information on these complicated types Please share anything relevant![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A "C·AL" denarius without the moneyer's name
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...