Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A bronze tetarteron of John III Ducas-Vatatzes, SBCV 2115 for $9,999?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 8253671, member: 26430"]It's a great example, period! I recognize that one from looking up all the ones I could find in auctions. It seems like there are very few showing the emperor's entire body on the flan with that much legend! Great details of his attire. The patina gives it the look of leather armor, which is really cool.</p><p><br /></p><p>Doesn't your description have a few too many characters on the left side legend? (<i>IШ ΔЄCΠOTHC O ΔϪKAC</i>) I think that's the "full legend" on trachy types. Your coin may have only 1-2 characters (<i>ЄC)</i> off flan (which is better than >95% of these).</p><p><br /></p><p>I think it's more like: <i>IШ ΔЄC O ΔϪKAC </i>(but I don't ever see the <i>Ϫ ...</i> Maybe only: <i>IШ ΔЄC O ΔKAC</i> ?). Funny thing about some early references -- de Saulcy had only seen the one coin & had to guess what the inscriptions were based on other types on John III's coinage (flat & cup coins), and got it wrong! Sabatier had access to a better example and was the first to give the legend above, which Goodacre also used in his 1933 Handbook (vol 3), though he gave fewer characters in his 1931 article. Sear & Suarez don't give legends. Haven't double-checked Hendy & DOC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally I go with the even short version, which is almost fully visible on yours (I've only got about 4.5 characters visible on mine): <i>IШ ΔЄC O ΔKAC</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 8253671, member: 26430"]It's a great example, period! I recognize that one from looking up all the ones I could find in auctions. It seems like there are very few showing the emperor's entire body on the flan with that much legend! Great details of his attire. The patina gives it the look of leather armor, which is really cool. Doesn't your description have a few too many characters on the left side legend? ([I]IШ ΔЄCΠOTHC O ΔϪKAC[/I]) I think that's the "full legend" on trachy types. Your coin may have only 1-2 characters ([I]ЄC)[/I] off flan (which is better than >95% of these). I think it's more like: [I]IШ ΔЄC O ΔϪKAC [/I](but I don't ever see the [I]Ϫ ...[/I] Maybe only: [I]IШ ΔЄC O ΔKAC[/I] ?). Funny thing about some early references -- de Saulcy had only seen the one coin & had to guess what the inscriptions were based on other types on John III's coinage (flat & cup coins), and got it wrong! Sabatier had access to a better example and was the first to give the legend above, which Goodacre also used in his 1933 Handbook (vol 3), though he gave fewer characters in his 1931 article. Sear & Suarez don't give legends. Haven't double-checked Hendy & DOC. Personally I go with the even short version, which is almost fully visible on yours (I've only got about 4.5 characters visible on mine): [I]IШ ΔЄC O ΔKAC[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A bronze tetarteron of John III Ducas-Vatatzes, SBCV 2115 for $9,999?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...