Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rrdenarius, post: 2779627, member: 75525&quot;]I like ancient &quot;mint errors&quot;, but I think they were not considered errors in that the workers converted metal into coins. Quality control was good, but I think coins per pound and per day were the key production criteria.</p><p>One of my favorites is an Octavian - </p><p>[ATTACH=full]642398[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]642399[/ATTACH] </p><p>both portraits are great!</p><p>I bought a lot of late Roman and Jewish mint errors a while back. Most of the LRB errors were brockages:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]642401[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I was the under-bidder on what I think is a die clash. You can see the letters under Tych&#039;s chin. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]642402[/ATTACH]</p><p>Later I bought a similar coin with less clash indication. I am less than certain about the coin I bought. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]642403[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]642404[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in