Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 8346116, member: 73489&quot;]<b><font size="5"><span style="color: #b30000">CAC POWER: </span></font></b> The value of the CAC designation -- regardless of whether you like it or hate it -- can&#039;t be denied from these prices.&nbsp; Note how a lower-graded Saint jumps up in price to eclipse a similar or even &quot;half-point&quot; higher Saint:</p><ul> <li>A <b><span style="color: #4d4dff">1927 MS65+ sold for $3,375</span></b> (w/bp).</li> <li>A <b><span style="color: #4d4dff">1927 MS65 sold for $2,925.</span></b></li> <li>A <b><span style="color: #4d4dff">1927 NGC MS65 CAC sold for $3,724</span></b></li> <li>A <b><span style="color: #00b359">1925 NGC MS66+ sold for $7,200</span></b>.</li> <li>A <b><span style="color: #00b359">1925 MS66 CAC for for $8,269.</span></b></li> <li>A <b>1924 NGC MS67 for $11,812</b></li> </ul><p>While some of the coins were in NGC slabs (albeit older ones that might be more conservatively graded), note that the CAC designation seems to drive the price differential, especially when there&#039;s a big price jump to the next grade.&nbsp; The 1927 MS65 NGC CAC sells for a nice premium to the MS65+ (PCGS).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in