Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A big one from the wish list: Siculo-Punic tetradrachm
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2754451, member: 56859"][ATTACH=full]631584[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>SICILY, Entella. Punic issues</b></p><p>c. 300-289 BCE; AR tetradrachm, 24 mm, 16.8 gm, 12h)</p><p>Obv: head of Melquart-Herakles right, wearing lion skin</p><p>Rev: head of horse left; astragalos (cut over poppy) to left, palm tree to right, Punic MHSBM (approximate meaning is "quaestors" or financial controllers) below</p><p>Ref: Jenkins, Punic 366 (O115/R298), series 5b</p><p><i>Ex Gorny & Mosch 138 (7 March 2005), lot 33</i></p><p><br /></p><p>This and other Punic tetradrachms have been on my wish list since I saw my first examples. It's hard to say why this type became such a must-have since I didn't know much about the circumstances of the coin. Actually, I guess it's <b>not</b> hard to say why: it's a beautiful coin. Sometimes that's reason enough <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>I assumed there would be extensive and colorful history to go with this coin, but that seems not to be the case. After winning the coin I began searching for interesting tidbits for a writeup. A first step for such things is always to check auction catalogs, especially old and higher-end catalogs which sometimes have nice blurbs that add interest. I checked all of my catalogs and online catalogs; checked various general and Greek numismatic books in my growing library. Zip, zilch, nada. No amusing anecdotes, no tantalizing tie-ins with history. Hmm.</p><p><br /></p><p>But... <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/" rel="nofollow">Digital Library Numis</a> to the rescue! <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/03-index/j-1/jenkins-gilbert-kenneth-1918-2005" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/03-index/j-1/jenkins-gilbert-kenneth-1918-2005" rel="nofollow">All four parts of "Coins of Punic Sicily"</a> are there, yay!!</p><p><br /></p><p>Some of my questions are answered in those articles:</p><ul> <li>Hoard evidence is what places these coins at Entella, which was under the control of Carthage at that time. The Punic Wars were still three or four decades away but there were ongoing problems with Agathokles. Perhaps these coins were used to pay troops and other costs of battle.</li> <li>The two main variations of this coin ("quaestors" issues and "people of the camp" issues) were probably issued concurrently and from the same location, although the reasons are cloudy. It might indicate that there was more than just army encampments there-- the Carthaginian state was doing more than just paying the army.</li> <li>The head of Tanit/horse head tetradrachms immediately preceded these coins. While this new obverse undoubtedly copies Alexander III tetradrachms, Punic Melqart had already been assimilated into Greek Herakles so the Carthaginians weren't abandoning their Punic iconography... they were just making coins that blended in better with the region. Alex III tets had already become extremely well known throughout the Mediterranean.</li> <li>I mistakenly thought there were hundreds of dies for the entire emission, since the Entella tetadrachms I was drawn to all had high die numbers. However, the die numbers for the series begin at 86 for the obverse and 227 for the reverse (earlier numbers are for earlier Punic coins in Jenkins' scheme). The "quaestors" tets have only 21 obverse and 81 reverse dies; the "people of the camp" tets have 20 obverse and 39 reverse dies. That makes more sense, because it's not like you see these on every numismatic corner <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></li> </ul><p>Anyway, this minutia is probably pretty boring to most of you. If it isn't, you might want to read the Jenkins articles.</p><p><br /></p><p>More importantly to me is that this was struck with one of my favorite dies for the series. I don't always have to have highly artistic coins in relatively high grade (have you <i>seen</i> all of my grungy but beloved coins of Roman Egypt? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />), but for this one I held out. I studied archives and made note of my favorite dies. For the obverse, die 115 was in the top tier and reverse die 298 is interesting because it was recut. I was happy to see this coin at auction.</p><p><br /></p><p>Speaking of the reverse die, it began life with a poppy in the left field but was later recut into an astragalos (knuckle bone; a gaming and/or fortune telling device).</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's the a coin struck with the same reverse die as mine, before recutting. That's a poppy in the left field. Note that the obverse die is also the same as my coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]631612[/ATTACH]</p><p>(<a href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=45987" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=45987" rel="nofollow">from CNG's archives</a>)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Artistic dies, good centering, good metal, good strike, little wear... happy sigh <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Please feel free to add you Punic coins or related issues. Coins of Agathokles from around the same time are also welcome.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2754451, member: 56859"][ATTACH=full]631584[/ATTACH] [B]SICILY, Entella. Punic issues[/B] c. 300-289 BCE; AR tetradrachm, 24 mm, 16.8 gm, 12h) Obv: head of Melquart-Herakles right, wearing lion skin Rev: head of horse left; astragalos (cut over poppy) to left, palm tree to right, Punic MHSBM (approximate meaning is "quaestors" or financial controllers) below Ref: Jenkins, Punic 366 (O115/R298), series 5b [I]Ex Gorny & Mosch 138 (7 March 2005), lot 33[/I] This and other Punic tetradrachms have been on my wish list since I saw my first examples. It's hard to say why this type became such a must-have since I didn't know much about the circumstances of the coin. Actually, I guess it's [B]not[/B] hard to say why: it's a beautiful coin. Sometimes that's reason enough :). I assumed there would be extensive and colorful history to go with this coin, but that seems not to be the case. After winning the coin I began searching for interesting tidbits for a writeup. A first step for such things is always to check auction catalogs, especially old and higher-end catalogs which sometimes have nice blurbs that add interest. I checked all of my catalogs and online catalogs; checked various general and Greek numismatic books in my growing library. Zip, zilch, nada. No amusing anecdotes, no tantalizing tie-ins with history. Hmm. But... [URL='https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/']Digital Library Numis[/URL] to the rescue! [URL='https://sites.google.com/site/digitallibrarynumis/03-index/j-1/jenkins-gilbert-kenneth-1918-2005']All four parts of "Coins of Punic Sicily"[/URL] are there, yay!! Some of my questions are answered in those articles: [LIST] [*]Hoard evidence is what places these coins at Entella, which was under the control of Carthage at that time. The Punic Wars were still three or four decades away but there were ongoing problems with Agathokles. Perhaps these coins were used to pay troops and other costs of battle. [*]The two main variations of this coin ("quaestors" issues and "people of the camp" issues) were probably issued concurrently and from the same location, although the reasons are cloudy. It might indicate that there was more than just army encampments there-- the Carthaginian state was doing more than just paying the army. [*]The head of Tanit/horse head tetradrachms immediately preceded these coins. While this new obverse undoubtedly copies Alexander III tetradrachms, Punic Melqart had already been assimilated into Greek Herakles so the Carthaginians weren't abandoning their Punic iconography... they were just making coins that blended in better with the region. Alex III tets had already become extremely well known throughout the Mediterranean. [*]I mistakenly thought there were hundreds of dies for the entire emission, since the Entella tetadrachms I was drawn to all had high die numbers. However, the die numbers for the series begin at 86 for the obverse and 227 for the reverse (earlier numbers are for earlier Punic coins in Jenkins' scheme). The "quaestors" tets have only 21 obverse and 81 reverse dies; the "people of the camp" tets have 20 obverse and 39 reverse dies. That makes more sense, because it's not like you see these on every numismatic corner :) [/LIST] Anyway, this minutia is probably pretty boring to most of you. If it isn't, you might want to read the Jenkins articles. More importantly to me is that this was struck with one of my favorite dies for the series. I don't always have to have highly artistic coins in relatively high grade (have you [I]seen[/I] all of my grungy but beloved coins of Roman Egypt? :D), but for this one I held out. I studied archives and made note of my favorite dies. For the obverse, die 115 was in the top tier and reverse die 298 is interesting because it was recut. I was happy to see this coin at auction. Speaking of the reverse die, it began life with a poppy in the left field but was later recut into an astragalos (knuckle bone; a gaming and/or fortune telling device). Here's the a coin struck with the same reverse die as mine, before recutting. That's a poppy in the left field. Note that the obverse die is also the same as my coin. [ATTACH=full]631612[/ATTACH] ([URL='https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=45987']from CNG's archives[/URL]) ... Artistic dies, good centering, good metal, good strike, little wear... happy sigh :) Please feel free to add you Punic coins or related issues. Coins of Agathokles from around the same time are also welcome.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A big one from the wish list: Siculo-Punic tetradrachm
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...