Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Beautiful Gold Stater... of Brutus?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8140021, member: 84744"]Well, [USER=83845]@Curtisimo[/USER], I seem to be obsessing about your coin and your post. You'd better write another intriguing post soon so I can think about something else! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=97383]@Al Kowsky[/USER] mentioned that there are actually three varieties of staters, and that does seem to be the case. In the reference that [USER=99456]@Sulla80[/USER] linked (thanks!) Lucian Munteanu distinguishes between the "simple" monograms, as on Curtisimo's coin, and the "complex" monograms. He also suggests the metal content is different between the two, with the simple monograms having lower gold content (citing Petolescu and others, I haven't tracked down these references). This suggests three separate issues, of course: simple monogram, complex monogram, and no monogram.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1418949[/ATTACH]</p><p>I've added the "messy" (mis-struck) simple monogram in the middle as part of a suggestion for how things went: first the simple monogram was struck (using Dacian gold?), and then (years later?) the complex monogram was struck (using looted Greek gold?). If the engraver of the complex monogram was illiterate but did his level best to copy a messy mis-struck version of the simple monogram – messily struck coins are quite common – that would explain the bizarre appearance of the complex monogram.</p><p><br /></p><p>The no-monogram type could have been struck anywhere before, during, or after that timeline.</p><p><br /></p><p>(NB: Yes, the complex monogram above is in silver - it seems all the drachms are of this variety. They appear to share an obverse die with the complex monogram staters. In fact the whole series seems to feature a very small number of obverse dies, maybe only 3, one for each variety! Thanks to [USER=83845]@Curtisimo[/USER] for discussion on this point. Maybe he will do the work to confirm it, I am too lazy. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />)</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, it is actually possible to recover the B+P+Y from the complex monogram too:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1418951[/ATTACH]</p><p>This shows the rho in green, the upsilon in red (either upside down or, a bit wonky, sideways), while the light blue shows how a B is completed from the existing rho.</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally I think the copying of a mis-struck simple monogram is more likely than this weird mess being an intentional B+P+Y. I also think a Latin BR isn't very likely either, although it must be admitted it's a little easier to recover that from the complex monogram than from the simple monogram. (But what's with the upper parts of the red upsilon then? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />) Maybe that's what Head et al. were looking at when they came up with their highly idealized and inaccurate versions of the monogram, as pictured by Curtisimo <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-beautiful-gold-stater-of-brutus.390998/page-2#post-8128562" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-beautiful-gold-stater-of-brutus.390998/page-2#post-8128562">here</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of course, they didn't have the additional knowledge we now have of the Buridava archaeological complex, or the First-Meris-type drachms - I'll post a bit more on Buridava/Cosota later. My suspicion now is that the large, wealthy settlement in the valley was known in Dacian as "Cos...", while the principle fortress was known as Buridava. Meaning that "KOΣON" refers to the settlement. Makes a lot more sense of the grammar on the coins too![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8140021, member: 84744"]Well, [USER=83845]@Curtisimo[/USER], I seem to be obsessing about your coin and your post. You'd better write another intriguing post soon so I can think about something else! :D [USER=97383]@Al Kowsky[/USER] mentioned that there are actually three varieties of staters, and that does seem to be the case. In the reference that [USER=99456]@Sulla80[/USER] linked (thanks!) Lucian Munteanu distinguishes between the "simple" monograms, as on Curtisimo's coin, and the "complex" monograms. He also suggests the metal content is different between the two, with the simple monograms having lower gold content (citing Petolescu and others, I haven't tracked down these references). This suggests three separate issues, of course: simple monogram, complex monogram, and no monogram. [ATTACH=full]1418949[/ATTACH] I've added the "messy" (mis-struck) simple monogram in the middle as part of a suggestion for how things went: first the simple monogram was struck (using Dacian gold?), and then (years later?) the complex monogram was struck (using looted Greek gold?). If the engraver of the complex monogram was illiterate but did his level best to copy a messy mis-struck version of the simple monogram – messily struck coins are quite common – that would explain the bizarre appearance of the complex monogram. The no-monogram type could have been struck anywhere before, during, or after that timeline. (NB: Yes, the complex monogram above is in silver - it seems all the drachms are of this variety. They appear to share an obverse die with the complex monogram staters. In fact the whole series seems to feature a very small number of obverse dies, maybe only 3, one for each variety! Thanks to [USER=83845]@Curtisimo[/USER] for discussion on this point. Maybe he will do the work to confirm it, I am too lazy. :D) That said, it is actually possible to recover the B+P+Y from the complex monogram too: [ATTACH=full]1418951[/ATTACH] This shows the rho in green, the upsilon in red (either upside down or, a bit wonky, sideways), while the light blue shows how a B is completed from the existing rho. Personally I think the copying of a mis-struck simple monogram is more likely than this weird mess being an intentional B+P+Y. I also think a Latin BR isn't very likely either, although it must be admitted it's a little easier to recover that from the complex monogram than from the simple monogram. (But what's with the upper parts of the red upsilon then? o_O) Maybe that's what Head et al. were looking at when they came up with their highly idealized and inaccurate versions of the monogram, as pictured by Curtisimo [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-beautiful-gold-stater-of-brutus.390998/page-2#post-8128562']here[/URL]. Of course, they didn't have the additional knowledge we now have of the Buridava archaeological complex, or the First-Meris-type drachms - I'll post a bit more on Buridava/Cosota later. My suspicion now is that the large, wealthy settlement in the valley was known in Dacian as "Cos...", while the principle fortress was known as Buridava. Meaning that "KOΣON" refers to the settlement. Makes a lot more sense of the grammar on the coins too![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Beautiful Gold Stater... of Brutus?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...