Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Bastien Intermediate follis (plus a discussion of early London mint coinage)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jamesicus, post: 4633448, member: 14873"]An added note [USER=100136]@thejewk[/USER]: It is great to read about your interest in the early London mint coinage of Constantius. In my opinion there is still much to be learned about it. In this thread, which I intended to be primarily a discussion of my Bastien intermediate Galerius Maximian follis, I included some of my notes from the time Hugh Cloke, Lee Toone and myself were very active participants in a related thread on the old AncientsInfo Forum - this in order to give some background and context to this discussion. These notes are kinda old now and I am sure that in some instances Cloke & Toone provide better updated information in their book than that in my notes. It goes without saying that information should supersede any that conflicts with my notes.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, I use the nomenclature Diocletian, Maximian Herculius, Constantius and Galerius Maximian for the Tetrarchs because that is the way it is employed by Sutherland in RIC, volume VI.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jamesicus, post: 4633448, member: 14873"]An added note [USER=100136]@thejewk[/USER]: It is great to read about your interest in the early London mint coinage of Constantius. In my opinion there is still much to be learned about it. In this thread, which I intended to be primarily a discussion of my Bastien intermediate Galerius Maximian follis, I included some of my notes from the time Hugh Cloke, Lee Toone and myself were very active participants in a related thread on the old AncientsInfo Forum - this in order to give some background and context to this discussion. These notes are kinda old now and I am sure that in some instances Cloke & Toone provide better updated information in their book than that in my notes. It goes without saying that information should supersede any that conflicts with my notes. BTW, I use the nomenclature Diocletian, Maximian Herculius, Constantius and Galerius Maximian for the Tetrarchs because that is the way it is employed by Sutherland in RIC, volume VI.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A Bastien Intermediate follis (plus a discussion of early London mint coinage)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...