Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jhinton, post: 1415124, member: 24410&quot;]The most obvious to me is the fact that all of the third printing is aligned on the back, something I have never seen on a fake error. (They usually just move one seal) and the quality of the printing is another indicator. Also you will notice that the embossing from the printing adds up as there is no evidence of prior stamping on the front. All this can be seen from the picture and it just looks “right” to me. Unfortunately you seem to have some sort of attitude about this so no doubt you will find something wrong with my explanation. So if you look here:</p><p><a href="http://www.donckelly.com/error/1995$1_3rdonback.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.donckelly.com/error/1995$1_3rdonback.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.donckelly.com/error/1995$1_3rdonback.html</a></p><p>or here:</p><p><a href="http://usrarecurrency.com/1995$1FederalReserveErrorNoteSnK26901476E.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://usrarecurrency.com/1995$1FederalReserveErrorNoteSnK26901476E.htm" rel="nofollow">http://usrarecurrency.com/1995$1FederalReserveErrorNoteSnK26901476E.htm</a></p><p>You will see that 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] printing errors for this series are quite common, like I said in my first post.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in