Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 82551, member: 66&quot;]You most recent picture is a perfect example of what I was saying.&nbsp; From that picture what I am seeing looks like die deterioration doubling.</p><p><br /></p><p>As to how to get something like what you believe this to be taken seriously, Try to meet up with someone with a nationally know reputation at a coin show and have them examine it in person.&nbsp; Plus there is a good chance that the only way you ae going to prove it will be to find another high grade specimen (AU or UNC).&nbsp; Del Romines, the discoverer of both the 1942/1-D mercury dime and the 1943/2 war nickel spent years trying to get someone to believe that these overdates existed.&nbsp; The dimes was dismissed as damage and the 43/2 as just a die crack through the 3.&nbsp; It wasn&#039;t until a high grade dime in the early 60&#039;s that it was accepted, and the nickel was not confirmed until I believe the late 70&#039;s.&nbsp; Almost 25 years after he first found the variety.&nbsp; And in both cases Del is not well known as the discoverer because he was not the person who found the high grade confirming specimen.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in