6 coins just back from CAC, guess which ones passed.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mill rat41, Aug 12, 2014.

  1. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member

    These 6 coins just came back from CAC, 4 passed and 2 didn't. Guess which ones flunked and why.

    NGC AU50:
    [​IMG]

    NGC AU58:
    [​IMG]

    PCGS MS62
    [​IMG]

    PCGS MS65:
    [​IMG]

    PCGS MS63:
    [​IMG]

    PCGS MS64:
    [​IMG]
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. josh's coins

    josh's coins Well-Known Member

    the pcgs ms65 saint gaudens for the color on the reverse. same for the other saint gaudens
     
  4. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    The first coin looks more in the X45 range to me, and I'm not sure CAC liked the color on it. I think it failed.

    I also think the Indian quarter eagle looks as if it might have an obverse planchet flaw around 10-11 o'clock on the obverse. That could result in a CAC failure to sticker.

    Also, what is on the $10 Indian obverse cheek? There is a circular pattern, but I think it could be my eyes or coincidental. I think it is probably OK.

    In any event, the Saints look fine to me as does the Peace Dollar.
     
    Galen59 likes this.
  5. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    The variation in color is normal and can be caused by varying content of trace metals in the gold alloy and a failure to have a perfectly homogenous alloy. Both of these factors can cause slight toning on gold coins, producing the patterns seen. I think both are attractive and look perfectly fine to me color wise.
     
  6. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member

    I don't think that is a planchet flaw, just a contact mark. I can't say for sure though, as the coins are locked away in the SBD. As for the Indian $10, that is just a reed mark - I dropped a DE on the coin before it was slabbed.

    Thanks for posting.
     
  7. josh's coins

    josh's coins Well-Known Member

    I've seen toning on gold coins before. In this case I figured that it might be a reason that CAC would fail them. Then again my definition of attractive toning is different than many others.
     
  8. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    I'm thinking the first two coins failed. The first looks worse than au 50 and the second one is questionable however I am having a tough time determining the amount of wear on it.
     
  9. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    All but the 1913 $10 Indian
     
  10. carboni7e

    carboni7e aka MonsterCoinz

    The first is too rough for for CAC. The second didn't CAC either, I think.
     
  11. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    I am going to say the 4 PCGS coins got stickers.
     
  12. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member


    4 of the 6 passed.
     
  13. Chiefbullsit

    Chiefbullsit CRAZY HORSE

    Good results, which ones did not pass?

    I'm saying 1 and 5.
     
    Ed Sims likes this.
  14. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member

    I will give it a day or two yet.
     
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am going to guess the 1859 and the 1926 missed.
     
  16. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I'm gonna say the 1859 no too baggy and the 1913 $10 no as it's either more worn or weakly struck and has a few significant marks
     
  17. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

  18. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    The 1928 Saint and the Indian Quarter got the CAC sticker.
     
  19. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    4 of them passed and got stickers. So you might want to pick another 2.
     
  20. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    OK you got me
    :angelic:
    The 1926 Saint and the peace dollar got stickers too.
     
  21. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    The 1859 & 1913 $10's did not CAC
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page