Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
50mm/f2.8 versus 90mm/f2.8 macro lenses for coin photos?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Theodosius, post: 2607384, member: 77077"]I am looking at the:</p><p><br /></p><p>Sony SEL90M28G FE 90mm f/2.8-22 Macro Lens ($1000) or</p><p>Sony SEL50M28 FE 50mm F2.8 Macro Lens ($500)</p><p><br /></p><p>as a possible upgrade to my Sony a6000 coin photography set up. Which lens is better for photographing coins? The minimum focal distance of the 90 is 11 inches while the minimum for the 50 is 6 inches (roughly). This makes it seem like the 50 would be a better choice.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does one give you more depth of field or more magnification or work better with less light? I think taking super close ups of parts of coins could be useful for analyzing possible fakes, looking at countermarks, etc. so I am not just after full coin pictures. Having a lot of depth of field is really useful when taking edge on shots to highlight high relief, edge seams, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>Assuming I don't care about using these lenses for anything other than coins and that the price difference does not matter, which one would be a better choice?</p><p><br /></p><p>John[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Theodosius, post: 2607384, member: 77077"]I am looking at the: Sony SEL90M28G FE 90mm f/2.8-22 Macro Lens ($1000) or Sony SEL50M28 FE 50mm F2.8 Macro Lens ($500) as a possible upgrade to my Sony a6000 coin photography set up. Which lens is better for photographing coins? The minimum focal distance of the 90 is 11 inches while the minimum for the 50 is 6 inches (roughly). This makes it seem like the 50 would be a better choice. Does one give you more depth of field or more magnification or work better with less light? I think taking super close ups of parts of coins could be useful for analyzing possible fakes, looking at countermarks, etc. so I am not just after full coin pictures. Having a lot of depth of field is really useful when taking edge on shots to highlight high relief, edge seams, etc. Assuming I don't care about using these lenses for anything other than coins and that the price difference does not matter, which one would be a better choice? John[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
50mm/f2.8 versus 90mm/f2.8 macro lenses for coin photos?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...