Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kevin Mader, post: 3933562, member: 106826&quot;]I dug into the RDV question a little more and although this information is a bit dated...it&#039;s what I&#039;ve got.&nbsp; Keep in mind that these are based on East Coast finds, so they may loosely apply to those in the center and West Coast.</p><p><br /></p><p>- For 1939, the rarer RDV 1938 are more valuable</p><p>- For 1939D, the rarer RDV 1938 are more valuable</p><p>- For 1939S, the rarer RDV 1940 are more valuable</p><p><br /></p><p>This was the data that applied to findings:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>1939(P)</b>: 40 w/RDV 1938 / 278 w/RDV 1940</p><p><br /></p><p>- 12.5% of my 1939 CRH finds were with RDV 1938</p><p>- (1) 1939 was a Henning nickel</p><p><br /></p><p><b>1939D</b>: 4 w/RDV 1938 / 10 w/RDV 1940</p><p><br /></p><p>- 28.5% of my 1939 CRH/Auction finds were with RDV 1938</p><p><br /></p><p><b>1939S</b>: 9 w/RDV 1938 / 3 w/RDV 1940</p><p><br /></p><p>- 75% of my 1939 CRH/Auction finds were with RDV 1938</p><p><br /></p><p>It would be interesting to know what someone in the middle of the country has for a ratio of RDV 1938 vs. RDV 1940 1939Ps and what another member here from the West Coast has for a ratio of 1939Ps.&nbsp; The numbers I have for D and S are too small to generate a meaningful ratio, but it would be nice to know those ratios too if they are available.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in