Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
5 on the cheek dime
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bmmartin, post: 4393295, member: 98956"][USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] thanks for the input! </p><p><br /></p><p>I wouldn't go as far as calling it as a poor man's doubled die haha</p><p><br /></p><p>I think [USER=66]@Conder101[/USER] posted the same in the other thread - I won't disagree with him on valuations - I think that's for the market to determine. Just as I won't disagree with you on significance. What makes the variety significant? Appearance? Causation? Scarcity? How much weight do we put on each factor?</p><p><br /></p><p>I do find the 1955 doubled die fascinating. But it's the end result of a "run of the mill" hub doubling isn't it? No mischief, no design change, no noticeable absence. But it's pronounced and rare. So, is it significant? IMO, yes, because it wasn't noticed until most coins had circulated. That's my stance. You may disagree. And that's fine. That's what makes these debates fun.</p><p><br /></p><p>Interesting, though, that you bring up the poor man's because there was some fraud already with this variety; an eBay seller recently sold a worn dime described as the "5" variety for $80-100. Absolutely disgusting. </p><p><br /></p><p>I digress. I wrote my recent posts for two reasons:</p><p><br /></p><p>(1) There's teaching and then there's being a snob. There's explaining it (like you did) and attempts at "sarcasm" that amount to little more than belittling. Would you send your child or a friend that was a novice to a forum where there's a lot of arrogance?</p><p><br /></p><p>I spoke with some people in the Atlanta area and why they don't go to many of the shows and the words that got thrown around a lot were snobs and elitists. Many didn't attend the Money Show because they just didn't like the atmosphere and if they did, they made cameos. My uncle told me similar stories and that's why I almost never go to shows, even local ones.</p><p><br /></p><p>This arrogance is why my son doesn't come on this forum anymore. He said a lot of people on here were mean or sounded like a-holes. It's a shame because I think there's a lot of useful information to be found here.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is coin collecting meant only for an elite few? I guess historically it was, but I like to think of it as fun and wish more people were interested. If anything, the history is really fascinating.</p><p><br /></p><p>(2) There's misinformation. You agree that it's a variety as does Conder, myself, and several others. However, there's a lot of people saying "pareidolia" or "error" when, IMHO, I think there's a distinction. It's like when those with variety experience hear "double die" rather than "doubled die" (did you cringe?). Then, there are people saying that it's NOT a variety.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both reasons are why [USER=44615]@paddyman98[/USER] was wrong. First, he claims that all experts have said it's not a variety AT ALL. Well, [USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER], clearly you're not an expert because YOU said it's a variety. Neither is Bill Fivas either it appears because HE said it was a variety. He just writes the book on it, but clearly he is no expert (this, my friends, is sarcasm).</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm not, , and I will be the first to admit this; I prefer Commonwealth coins TBH. I only recently began looking closer at varieties with my son because I feel it's a good entryway into collecting. However, I don't present myself as one or any of that nonsense puffery. I don't ridicule others for seeing pareidolia (for those that no how to use the word properly, did you cringe?).</p><p><br /></p><p>Second, I fear that there are some on here with God complexes. There's a lot of negativity coupled with defensiveness. What foolish questions! How dare you question me with this idiotic question! Let me give you the wrong answer! OH NO, he's found my weak spot...</p><p><br /></p><p>Was a photograph with a well-respected expert meant to impress me? Congratulations! I have a photograph of me during my time studying the laws at Oxford; I'm having a pint where Bill Clinton allegedly didn't inhale.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also have a photograph with my kid and Patrick Starfish at Universal Studios and that's the more meaningful photo of the two in my books. Because it was all about having fun.</p><p><br /></p><p>And that's really how we should be acting on here, right. In ways to attract more people to our hobby rather than repulse them. Giving them good information rather than false knowledge. But most importantly, remembering why we got into collecting in the first place.</p><p><br /></p><p>Have fun, swap coins, and keep it light. Cheers mates![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bmmartin, post: 4393295, member: 98956"][USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] thanks for the input! I wouldn't go as far as calling it as a poor man's doubled die haha I think [USER=66]@Conder101[/USER] posted the same in the other thread - I won't disagree with him on valuations - I think that's for the market to determine. Just as I won't disagree with you on significance. What makes the variety significant? Appearance? Causation? Scarcity? How much weight do we put on each factor? I do find the 1955 doubled die fascinating. But it's the end result of a "run of the mill" hub doubling isn't it? No mischief, no design change, no noticeable absence. But it's pronounced and rare. So, is it significant? IMO, yes, because it wasn't noticed until most coins had circulated. That's my stance. You may disagree. And that's fine. That's what makes these debates fun. Interesting, though, that you bring up the poor man's because there was some fraud already with this variety; an eBay seller recently sold a worn dime described as the "5" variety for $80-100. Absolutely disgusting. I digress. I wrote my recent posts for two reasons: (1) There's teaching and then there's being a snob. There's explaining it (like you did) and attempts at "sarcasm" that amount to little more than belittling. Would you send your child or a friend that was a novice to a forum where there's a lot of arrogance? I spoke with some people in the Atlanta area and why they don't go to many of the shows and the words that got thrown around a lot were snobs and elitists. Many didn't attend the Money Show because they just didn't like the atmosphere and if they did, they made cameos. My uncle told me similar stories and that's why I almost never go to shows, even local ones. This arrogance is why my son doesn't come on this forum anymore. He said a lot of people on here were mean or sounded like a-holes. It's a shame because I think there's a lot of useful information to be found here. Is coin collecting meant only for an elite few? I guess historically it was, but I like to think of it as fun and wish more people were interested. If anything, the history is really fascinating. (2) There's misinformation. You agree that it's a variety as does Conder, myself, and several others. However, there's a lot of people saying "pareidolia" or "error" when, IMHO, I think there's a distinction. It's like when those with variety experience hear "double die" rather than "doubled die" (did you cringe?). Then, there are people saying that it's NOT a variety. Both reasons are why [USER=44615]@paddyman98[/USER] was wrong. First, he claims that all experts have said it's not a variety AT ALL. Well, [USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER], clearly you're not an expert because YOU said it's a variety. Neither is Bill Fivas either it appears because HE said it was a variety. He just writes the book on it, but clearly he is no expert (this, my friends, is sarcasm). I'm not, , and I will be the first to admit this; I prefer Commonwealth coins TBH. I only recently began looking closer at varieties with my son because I feel it's a good entryway into collecting. However, I don't present myself as one or any of that nonsense puffery. I don't ridicule others for seeing pareidolia (for those that no how to use the word properly, did you cringe?). Second, I fear that there are some on here with God complexes. There's a lot of negativity coupled with defensiveness. What foolish questions! How dare you question me with this idiotic question! Let me give you the wrong answer! OH NO, he's found my weak spot... Was a photograph with a well-respected expert meant to impress me? Congratulations! I have a photograph of me during my time studying the laws at Oxford; I'm having a pint where Bill Clinton allegedly didn't inhale. I also have a photograph with my kid and Patrick Starfish at Universal Studios and that's the more meaningful photo of the two in my books. Because it was all about having fun. And that's really how we should be acting on here, right. In ways to attract more people to our hobby rather than repulse them. Giving them good information rather than false knowledge. But most importantly, remembering why we got into collecting in the first place. Have fun, swap coins, and keep it light. Cheers mates![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
5 on the cheek dime
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...