Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
5 on the cheek dime
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bmmartin, post: 4392798, member: 98956"]Nice photo! I should have taken one with Mr. Fivas in Atlanta! Except he was wearing his Navy jacket! GO ARMY!</p><p><br /></p><p>Re: Lint marks</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] I think put it best in his post. Likely a struck-through piece during the die-making process.</p><p><br /></p><p>I subscribe to the "lint-mark" theory, but that it occurred between the hub and die during the die-making process as [USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] pointed out.</p><p><br /></p><p>This would have created an incuse image on the die, which would in turn create relief elements on the coins themselves. Except I wasn't taught that term in that way - usually it's meant when talking about coins getting struck rather than dies getting made. </p><p><br /></p><p>I don't know. Definitions expand. My waist expands. A lot of things expand.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, mere lint ON the die would cause an incuse image. Like any other struck-through.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is basic knowledge and I'm sure you don't have to be taught this, but just throwing it out there because I think it will help beginners.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's the same explanation used for the D on the Bell proof Franklin and the Superbird Quarter. I haven't seen the Franklin D, but I've seen the Superbird. </p><p><br /></p><p>This variety is just much more impressive because of its prominence when fully struck. You don't have to look for X feather at Y notch at Z angle of lighting.</p><p><br /></p><p>And I'm sure what Oldhoopster explained is exactly what Mr. Weinberg meant when he said it was a lint mark. I'm pretty sure he will agree in a heartbeat that the "5" is in relief on the coin - it REALLY sticks out.</p><p><br /></p><p>I mean, an 11-year old found one... by looking at eBay photos... I can't even tell if it's Roosevelt or my ex-wife in some of those photos TBH.</p><p><br /></p><p>I usually don't attend shows or conventions btw, I like to shelter-in-place ALL the time (people scare me, coins are my friends).</p><p><br /></p><p>This might be why I've never had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Weinberg?</p><p><br /></p><p>If he wants to see one in-hand, I wouldn't mind sending him mine to look at.</p><p><br /></p><p>He didn't want to look at the coin [USER=97879]@Nick57[/USER] has, but maybe now that there are some rumblings... from extremely reliable sources... that the variety will be in the next CPG... Maybe, he might have a change in heart?</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin is pretty neat. You really should see one in-hand if you like varieties.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bmmartin, post: 4392798, member: 98956"]Nice photo! I should have taken one with Mr. Fivas in Atlanta! Except he was wearing his Navy jacket! GO ARMY! Re: Lint marks [USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] I think put it best in his post. Likely a struck-through piece during the die-making process. I subscribe to the "lint-mark" theory, but that it occurred between the hub and die during the die-making process as [USER=84179]@Oldhoopster[/USER] pointed out. This would have created an incuse image on the die, which would in turn create relief elements on the coins themselves. Except I wasn't taught that term in that way - usually it's meant when talking about coins getting struck rather than dies getting made. I don't know. Definitions expand. My waist expands. A lot of things expand. However, mere lint ON the die would cause an incuse image. Like any other struck-through. This is basic knowledge and I'm sure you don't have to be taught this, but just throwing it out there because I think it will help beginners. It's the same explanation used for the D on the Bell proof Franklin and the Superbird Quarter. I haven't seen the Franklin D, but I've seen the Superbird. This variety is just much more impressive because of its prominence when fully struck. You don't have to look for X feather at Y notch at Z angle of lighting. And I'm sure what Oldhoopster explained is exactly what Mr. Weinberg meant when he said it was a lint mark. I'm pretty sure he will agree in a heartbeat that the "5" is in relief on the coin - it REALLY sticks out. I mean, an 11-year old found one... by looking at eBay photos... I can't even tell if it's Roosevelt or my ex-wife in some of those photos TBH. I usually don't attend shows or conventions btw, I like to shelter-in-place ALL the time (people scare me, coins are my friends). This might be why I've never had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Weinberg? If he wants to see one in-hand, I wouldn't mind sending him mine to look at. He didn't want to look at the coin [USER=97879]@Nick57[/USER] has, but maybe now that there are some rumblings... from extremely reliable sources... that the variety will be in the next CPG... Maybe, he might have a change in heart? The coin is pretty neat. You really should see one in-hand if you like varieties.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
5 on the cheek dime
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...