Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
$5 Indian 1909 S
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8298024, member: 24314"]Look guys. You cannot take a "science-like" endeavor such as numismatics and start making up things to suit yourself. Words mean certain things. Collectors can become informed by reading, taking classes, etc. OR they can roll along in their own world and frustrate or confuse those both more knowledgeable or less knowledgeable. This thread is an example. According to the first post after the OP's, the coin is a die struck counterfeit. Unfortunately, that was not stated directly until later in the thread. <b> It does not have an added mint mark!</b>" It is not an "added S counterfeit" either. Writing that the coin has an added "S" because it is in the wrong position and is not the correct shape is also incorrect. <span style="color: #660000">I <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie30" alt=":bucktooth:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> crapped all over the thread when I said that was a good guess. It was <b>not.</b> </span><span style="color: #000000">What was </span><span style="color: #006600"><b>good</b></span><span style="color: #000000"> is the fact that members knew something did not look right with the mint mark. </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">There is one more thing that might be confusing. If I take a genuine coin and attach a tiny mint mark to it - it is an altered coin with an added mint mark. If I take a genuine coin with a "D" mint mark and tool the "D" into the shape of an "O" or "S" it becomes an altered coin with an altered mint mark. If I take a genuine coin and tool the mint mark area up into a raised bit of metal I can then shape into an "S," it is an altered coin - period. Some could call that an "added mint mark" but many would not know exactly what it was without seeing the coin in hand. That was one point I was making. The same is true when parts of any coin's design are reengraved to add details that are missing due to a weak strike or circulation wear. The coin is either reengraved, tooled, or altered even though someone "ADDED" the missing ___________ derail. Are you as confused as you think I am. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8298024, member: 24314"]Look guys. You cannot take a "science-like" endeavor such as numismatics and start making up things to suit yourself. Words mean certain things. Collectors can become informed by reading, taking classes, etc. OR they can roll along in their own world and frustrate or confuse those both more knowledgeable or less knowledgeable. This thread is an example. According to the first post after the OP's, the coin is a die struck counterfeit. Unfortunately, that was not stated directly until later in the thread. [B] It does not have an added mint mark![/B]" It is not an "added S counterfeit" either. Writing that the coin has an added "S" because it is in the wrong position and is not the correct shape is also incorrect. [COLOR=#660000]I :bucktooth: crapped all over the thread when I said that was a good guess. It was [B]not.[/B] [/COLOR][COLOR=#000000]What was [/COLOR][COLOR=#006600][B]good[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] is the fact that members knew something did not look right with the mint mark. There is one more thing that might be confusing. If I take a genuine coin and attach a tiny mint mark to it - it is an altered coin with an added mint mark. If I take a genuine coin with a "D" mint mark and tool the "D" into the shape of an "O" or "S" it becomes an altered coin with an altered mint mark. If I take a genuine coin and tool the mint mark area up into a raised bit of metal I can then shape into an "S," it is an altered coin - period. Some could call that an "added mint mark" but many would not know exactly what it was without seeing the coin in hand. That was one point I was making. The same is true when parts of any coin's design are reengraved to add details that are missing due to a weak strike or circulation wear. The coin is either reengraved, tooled, or altered even though someone "ADDED" the missing ___________ derail. Are you as confused as you think I am. :D:p [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
$5 Indian 1909 S
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...