Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
3RD party Graders.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2391170, member: 24314"][USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] said: I have no problem with this; I just don't think decimal places are necessary. <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 89)">I agree but they are coming. I have heard they are being used INTERNALLY by the graders at one TPGS already.</span></p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] sais: How do I teach someone how many marks - and where - equal MS63 when I then have to say, "but not when it's pretty; then that many marks equal MS64? And if you're not a toning fan, you might not even think it's pretty but you gotta give it 64 anyways?" <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">I don't find ANY PROBLEM with teaching ANYONE how to grade and I'll bet you don't either. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> So this is a non-problem for me making it hard to reply. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Try this: You , me, and our mythical student here <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> will eventually develop our own PERSONAL standards and judgment of style, art, and beauty. However, the TPGS's set the INDUSTRY STANDARDS so you, me, and our student better know what's going on in the "BIG WORLD" or we failed as a teacher. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie55" alt=":hurting:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie23" alt=":bigtears:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">"Pretty" is in the eye of the beholder. Beautiful toning/tarnish/corrosion can raise or lower the TECHNICAL GRADE. [BTW, that was one of the downfalls of TRUE technical grading as "strike" and "eye appeal" were not factored in to the final grade.]</span></p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] Said: Bull. It's Net/Details grading in reverse - "MS63, Net 64."<span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"> Yes, I think you got it and don't forget about MS-64, NET 63! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] Said: Bull. Where do the TPG's get off telling <b>me</b> what I think is a nice coin by forcing me up a grade for it? <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Although many of your opinions are good, NO ONE OF ANY IMPORTANCE CARES WHAT YOU (me and our student for that matter) THINK/DO</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie103" alt=":yack:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> with regards to numismatics. They don't even consider that you exist so they do not TELL you anything. It's very humbling. We are worthless little "specks." </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">Need Proof? I have tried on several occasions to get TPGS graders to chime in on these questions and they laugh. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Except in a few cases - Jay Turner and Dave Lange on the NGC forum <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> - come to mind; NO ONE CARES. I think I can speak for you here also when I say "I don't care what the TPGS's think either <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />...BUT I STUDY THE WAY THEY GRADE so as not to be ignorant of market standards. </span></p><p><br /></p><p><b>[USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] said: Save the numbers for technical grading</b>. <span style="color: rgb(0, 179, 0)">There is no technical grading that I know of being practiced COMMERCIALLY outside a seminar classroom. If someone uses this system (as I do) for their personal standards that's fine. Just remember; <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">NO ONE CARES what we do! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2391170, member: 24314"][USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] said: I have no problem with this; I just don't think decimal places are necessary. [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 89)]I agree but they are coming. I have heard they are being used INTERNALLY by the graders at one TPGS already.[/COLOR] [USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] sais: How do I teach someone how many marks - and where - equal MS63 when I then have to say, "but not when it's pretty; then that many marks equal MS64? And if you're not a toning fan, you might not even think it's pretty but you gotta give it 64 anyways?" [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]I don't find ANY PROBLEM with teaching ANYONE how to grade and I'll bet you don't either. :cigar: So this is a non-problem for me making it hard to reply. :confused: Try this: You , me, and our mythical student here :bookworm: will eventually develop our own PERSONAL standards and judgment of style, art, and beauty. However, the TPGS's set the INDUSTRY STANDARDS so you, me, and our student better know what's going on in the "BIG WORLD" or we failed as a teacher. :hurting::bigtears: "Pretty" is in the eye of the beholder. Beautiful toning/tarnish/corrosion can raise or lower the TECHNICAL GRADE. [BTW, that was one of the downfalls of TRUE technical grading as "strike" and "eye appeal" were not factored in to the final grade.][/COLOR] [USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] Said: Bull. It's Net/Details grading in reverse - "MS63, Net 64."[COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] Yes, I think you got it and don't forget about MS-64, NET 63! :D[/COLOR] [USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] Said: Bull. Where do the TPG's get off telling [B]me[/B] what I think is a nice coin by forcing me up a grade for it? [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]Although many of your opinions are good, NO ONE OF ANY IMPORTANCE CARES WHAT YOU (me and our student for that matter) THINK/DO :yack::yack::yack::yack: with regards to numismatics. They don't even consider that you exist so they do not TELL you anything. It's very humbling. We are worthless little "specks." Need Proof? I have tried on several occasions to get TPGS graders to chime in on these questions and they laugh. :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious::hilarious: Except in a few cases - Jay Turner and Dave Lange on the NGC forum :angelic: - come to mind; NO ONE CARES. I think I can speak for you here also when I say "I don't care what the TPGS's think either :p...BUT I STUDY THE WAY THEY GRADE so as not to be ignorant of market standards. [/COLOR] [B][USER=1892]@SuperDave[/USER] said: Save the numbers for technical grading[/B]. [COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)]There is no technical grading that I know of being practiced COMMERCIALLY outside a seminar classroom. If someone uses this system (as I do) for their personal standards that's fine. Just remember; [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]NO ONE CARES what we do! :facepalm:[/COLOR][/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
3RD party Graders.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...