3 Cent - 1865 Retained Cud on Reverse - My Oldest Error

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by paddyman98, Dec 3, 2016.

  1. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Hi all,
    I wanted to share my newest acquisition which now also happens to be my oldest Mint Error Coin in my collection.. It's a 1865 3 Cent Nickel (Not Silver)
    with a Retained Die Break on the Reverse side. Also known as a Retained Cud.
    Retained Cud info I want to share with you - http://www.error-ref.com/anvil-die-retained-cud/

    Enjoy :woot:
    a.jpg aa.jpg aaaa.jpg aaa.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2016
    PennyPenny, old49er, dchjr and 9 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Amos 811

    Amos 811 DisMember

    Thats pretty sweet bro!
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  4. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    With the US mint still cranking out errors it is easy to forget how much trouble the mint went through back then with trying to strike copper nickel coins, nickel being a harder metal that was new to coinage presented a challenge. Beginning with the FE and early IHC cents, but then onto the nickel three cent and five cent coins the mint went through dies like crazy. They chipped, cracked etc, then the other problem was die clashing caused by careless workers.

    I like the doubling in the date on the piece.
     
    Noah Finney, paddyman98 and Amos 811 like this.
  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Hey WOW
    I didn't notice the doubling! Thanks for pointing that out to me!!!
    what.JPG
     
  6. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    very cool, check it for clash as well..
     
    Paul M. and paddyman98 like this.
  7. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    As a collector of nickel three cent pieces nice score Paddyman98 repunched date, cud, clashes, you scored the hat trick on this one! Two thumbs up!
     
    Paul M., Seattlite86 and paddyman98 like this.
  8. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Thanks! I'm just amazed at the other attributions.
    I erred in stating that it was silver in my first post. I corrected it to Nickel.
     
    Seattlite86 and Paddy54 like this.
  9. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Pun intended? I LOVE errors, and love how many yours has. Great coin :)
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  10. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Nice coin, but I have to ask this question . Am I the only one that see this coin has been dipped ?
     
  11. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Sweet pick up!! I love the RPM and the clashing. What a fantastic example to own.
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  12. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    FS-304. Pretty dramatic. :) Not really rare. :(
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  13. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Oh man.. why you want to be a party pooper! Hahaha
    If that's your observation NGC didn't catch that or else it probably would of received a Details Grade.. correct?
    Well whatever the case it's mine and I love it! ;)
     
  14. Old Error Guy

    Old Error Guy Well-Known Member

    I continue to say that the grading companies do a disservice to the coin owners when they don't use the more common nomenclature on the slabs. NGC seems to be getting worse.....
     
    Paul M. and paddyman98 like this.
  15. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Retained cud would be the common nomenclature or a slang description of it, but retained die break is the more precise and descriptive term. I'm with NGC on this. I would rather have the more precise description than a slang term even if the slang is more commonly used.
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  16. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Interesting. I just did the NGC Certification Verification for this slab and the picture they have is not for a MINT ERROR. Must of been re-submitted.
    XF45.JPG
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  17. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Hopefully it is the same coin! I'm guessing if it made it through twice without a details grade it is good to go?
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page