Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
25C - Clamshell Lamination - A Different kind of Lamination - Thread #7
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Nick69, post: 2987856, member: 92972"]Thank you for your response. I just wanted to say one other thing about Buffalo Nickels. From my point of view through regular Buffalo Nickels (not errors such as the 1914/(3), 1916DDO, 1918/7-D, 1936-D 3-1/2 leg, 1937-D 3 leg [I would consider them errors and NOT part of the regular series]) the ONLY Buffalo Nickel more valuable than the 1914-D is the 1913-S Type2 therefore wouldn't that make the 1914-D a KEY date and not a semi key date? Or do you just consider the KEY date coin to be the MOST valuable coin in a series? Also from what I can see the 1916-S and the 1921-D Mercury Dimes are worth more than the 1921-P. Therefore if you consider the 1921-P Mercury a KEY date then why isn't the 1914-D Buffalo also considered a KEY date? Oh and BTW Mercury Dimes also have what I would call errors too the 1942/1 and the 1942/1-D. Sorry I don't mean to be argumentative I'm just trying to stand my ground for the 1914-D Buffalo.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Nick69, post: 2987856, member: 92972"]Thank you for your response. I just wanted to say one other thing about Buffalo Nickels. From my point of view through regular Buffalo Nickels (not errors such as the 1914/(3), 1916DDO, 1918/7-D, 1936-D 3-1/2 leg, 1937-D 3 leg [I would consider them errors and NOT part of the regular series]) the ONLY Buffalo Nickel more valuable than the 1914-D is the 1913-S Type2 therefore wouldn't that make the 1914-D a KEY date and not a semi key date? Or do you just consider the KEY date coin to be the MOST valuable coin in a series? Also from what I can see the 1916-S and the 1921-D Mercury Dimes are worth more than the 1921-P. Therefore if you consider the 1921-P Mercury a KEY date then why isn't the 1914-D Buffalo also considered a KEY date? Oh and BTW Mercury Dimes also have what I would call errors too the 1942/1 and the 1942/1-D. Sorry I don't mean to be argumentative I'm just trying to stand my ground for the 1914-D Buffalo.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
25C - Clamshell Lamination - A Different kind of Lamination - Thread #7
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...