Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 968077, member: 19463&quot;]19 is Claudius II but your focus and the glue are hiding the reverse from me.&nbsp; Minimal value.</p><p><br /></p><p>20 is one of the Gallo-Roman usurpers like Postumus or Tetricus but focus and glue again prevent ID.&nbsp; The above two and Victorinus would be minimal value.&nbsp; Marius or Laelianus might be worth paying someone to conserve the coin but only if the ID is certain.&nbsp; The thing could be the third known coin of Domitian II in which case it would send all the kids to college but the chance of that is somewhere beyond a billion to one.&nbsp; Is the coin worse than the others or just the photo?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>If you removed these from a card pasted up by a 19th century collector, you could have halved the value of the group depending on what he wrote on that card.&nbsp; I have seen coins with similar reverse residue that were part of really old groups and would sell as a &#039;history of collecting&#039; item for more than the sum of the coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in