Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pickin and Grinin, post: 2900991, member: 73995&quot;]As far as my knowledge is concerned the more metal flow from devices, and waviness of the die is a sign of a later die state. Not the other way around. The reverse shown does show some deterioration around the O just not the amount in the pic from linc cent resource.</p><p>Second you see a die crack that just isn&#039;t there.</p><p>Here is another photo of the reverse.[ATTACH=full]698771[/ATTACH] and a close up of the &quot;die crack&quot; area.[ATTACH=full]698772[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, if we use the EPU photos from&nbsp; <a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html</a></p><p>And you say that the reverse of the 22 weak D in question is a later die state.</p><p>EPU in a later die state could trail into the rim as the rev. photo&#039;ed in Die pair 1 but beings that die cracks get stronger as the die progresses we should see a major die crack identifying it as 1.</p><p><br /></p><p>In this case, I am using die pair 3 as an example. Using the cent in question EPU extends toward the rim like die pair 3, and starting with R is starts to fade from the rim detail. Die pair 1 does not fade to the rim and EPU is much more detailed, than die pair 3.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in