Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dponsness, post: 561041, member: 14967&quot;]Yep, I missed that one!&nbsp; I would concur with this as an additional type as it was a design change from the &quot;original&quot; other than the &quot;subject matter&quot; of the type due to a change in the legislation and thus a design change in the series other than the planned changes to the obverse of the coin.&nbsp; That would take the total to 14 thru 2009 and 16 thru 2010.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in