Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kevin Mader, post: 17758698, member: 106826&quot;]A couple of comments:</p><ul> <li>As presented, Randy is right...it looks interesting.</li> <li>As noted though, this looks to be a case of reflections and perhaps some die wash</li> <li>High magnification creates distortions that trick the eye.</li> </ul><p>When posted coins for attribution/consultation, you are best to put out full images of the obverse and reverse.&nbsp; This way, if there are markers those helping out here might be able to dial in on them and help you with the diagnosis.&nbsp; As you&#039;ll note with Randy&#039;s specimen, significant doubling is pretty obvious.&nbsp; Zooming isn&#039;t necessary.&nbsp; Minor doubling usually requires magnification.&nbsp;&nbsp; Taking crisp, clear photos helps tremendously. Have fun and experiment with the photo taking.</p><p><br /></p><p>Typically speaking, for the single-squeeze process, Class 2 doubling is unlikely (if at all possible).&nbsp; Normally, this class of doubling affects the outer devices.&nbsp; Class 8 tilted doubling normally affects the centermost devices.&nbsp; Single-squeeze is primarily Class 8 doubling.&nbsp; So when investigating the outer devices, check for evidence of die deterioration and/or machine damage.&nbsp; These are typically the culprits we see here.</p><p><br /></p><p>Welcome to the mix, Johnny![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in