Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Neal, post: 8050173, member: 43872&quot;]Thanks for the quick reply.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, in the pictures it could be seen that way.&nbsp; But in hand it differs from damage that I&#039;m familiar with in several ways.&nbsp; First, it was from an unopened uncirculated bank roll.&nbsp; There are few ways I can imagine that would put that mark on it from the mint to the bank.&nbsp; Second, it is in a tight place in the field.&nbsp; It would be unlikely to receive that damage to the field without resulting in damage to the devices all around it, although the top of the spyglass is missing in the depression.&nbsp; Third, there is no raised metal around it as would be likely if it had been hit hard enough to make that deep a depression.&nbsp; Fourth, which my poor pictures don&#039;t show, the surface of the entire indentation matches the surface of the rest of the field and devices without the usual &quot;shiny&quot; look of scratched or pushed away metal.&nbsp; Fifth, and another thing the pictures don&#039;t show, is the indentation continues as a series of very fine lines in the field, going &quot;behind&quot; the shoreline and above the people in back of the canoe without scratching or changing those devices in any way.&nbsp; I wish I could photograph that, better but my poor camera (literally held together with a rubber band) just won&#039;t. This picture gives a little more detail.[ATTACH=full]1393979[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in