Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Gorham_Collector, post: 8299746, member: 133572&quot;]I’ll say this in response to the people who say it md within the hugging the process to the die. </p><p><br /></p><p>what about the other classes of doubling then classes 4 (offset hub doubling) class 6 (distended hub doubling) and class 8 (tilted hub doubling)</p><p>There are shield cent doubled dies with these classes of doubling for example 2014 wddo-002 &amp; 003 are examples of class 8.&nbsp; And we got 2015 wddo-006 a class 4 doubled die. </p><p>Also 2019 wddo-011 is a class 9.</p><p>There are examples like 2015 wddo-008 that are classes 4&amp;8.</p><p><br /></p><p>so with that said then are we gonna call all the older coins with classes of doubling 4,6,8 md with the hubbing? And only say class 1 is the only form of doubling that matters I understand that reasoning with how it occurs and HOW IT LOOKS ETC more appealing. Then these other classes. </p><p>mid that’s the case we’d be kissing some great older date varieties away with these classes of doubling. And labeling them as nothing important according to what I’ve seen throughout this thread. Just some of my thoughts opinions. Scattered here[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in