Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KBBPLL, post: 26131011, member: 104064&quot;]Show us images of your own example. That seems to have been lost in all of this.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://cuds-on-coins.com/pre-cuds-on-lincoln-cents-1959-present-rcd-2/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://cuds-on-coins.com/pre-cuds-on-lincoln-cents-1959-present-rcd-2/" rel="nofollow">https://cuds-on-coins.com/pre-cuds-on-lincoln-cents-1959-present-rcd-2/</a></p><p>What I glean from your posts is that Cuds On Coins could correct their info on this. They are showing the Coin World example but not showing it rotated, and there&#039;s a second RCD-1c-2016-01 listing specifically differentiated as &quot;rotated.&quot; The Coin World article is only addressing the &quot;rare combination of errors&quot; - both a broken die and a die rotation. The two Cuds On Coins listings imply that there exists both rotated and not rotated examples, but that seems to be wrong. Who knows. I&#039;m guessing only rotated examples exist. </p><p><br /></p><p>Bottom line - there&#039;s a ton of mistakes in numismatic publications. They found something new to publish and slapped it out there.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in