Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;usmc60, post: 2309789, member: 76739&quot;]ken it&#039;s nice to hear from you again.&nbsp; Sir in this day and age with the Internet it is extremely hard to be uninformed.&nbsp; You can look up almost anything, and be well informed.&nbsp; Sir I started this conversation in Seattle over 13 years ago, big brother cude does not want to share its name with&nbsp; little brother chip.&nbsp; This debate went on for well over six months, sir just because someone does not believe the same thing you believe does not make them (uninformed) as you are entitled to your opinion&nbsp; let other people be entitled to their opinion.&nbsp; And KEN&nbsp; I&#039;m sure you and other members are gonna disagree with this statement.&nbsp; I&#039;m not gonna pay top dollar for a rIm chip . ( And yes I know you&#039;re going to say it is not A chip that is A CUD) KEN why do you find it so hard to let people believe in their opinions, sir in over six months of debate you have the pros and you have the cons, evidently that&#039;s not gonna change.&nbsp; AND the conclusion was that name and location, on the market the cudes value is higher than the chip.&nbsp; In reality, the cause of a die break are basically the same. a piece of metal falling off a die maybe that&#039;s a reason the red book failed to put the definition of the die chip in&nbsp; the 2016 edition 23,000,000 copies sold this year.ken as someone that is informed.&nbsp; You can explain why the red book left out definition of a die chip?&nbsp; ken since you disagreed with the last site I&#039;d mention coinabout and it went over your head and evidently others.&nbsp; Let&#039;s try NUMISMATIC ERROR&nbsp; glossary of NUMISMATIC TERMS.&nbsp; Sir.&nbsp; You are definitely not going to like this.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in