Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;usmc60, post: 2308880, member: 76739&quot;]Sir I truly appreciate your comments and advice.&nbsp; And I would like to address some of your comments sir I do not know why one of your members would take the word out of a comment and take it personally, it seems to me that this individual has issues that need to be addressed.&nbsp; Sir anyone has a right to disagree with me that is your right.&nbsp; But no one has a right to tell me what I believe in wrong.&nbsp; Sir I believe you&#039;re old enough to know the cud and chip debate has been going on for many years.&nbsp; And the clean or not to clean controversy.&nbsp; Sir you&#039;re right there are new and young and even old coin collectors on the site and all must remember there are two sides to a coin and it is not wrong to believe that a definition should be revised, I get in trouble when I use old sayings, but here goes why does big brother cud, not want to share its name with its little brother chip?&nbsp; Sir you seem to be wise and knowledgeable, why is it that the 2016 Redbook does not have the definition of die chip in it.&nbsp; And I do believe 23 millions of these books are sold.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in