Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Oldhoopster, post: 3318536, member: 84179&quot;]If you look closely on a large monitor, nearly all of the extra images are mirror-reverse.&nbsp; As mentioned, the QUARTER does appear normally twice.&nbsp; One possible explanation is during the 1st squeeze, the other quarter picked up a reverse image of QUARTER.&nbsp; On a subsequent squeeze, the reverse image QUARTER was transferred from the missing coin, back to the original coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>If it occurred at the mint, how would you get multiple reverse images, with one extra normal image?&nbsp; And how would the reverse appear flattened?&nbsp; The reverse should be fully struck if it was still in the die chamber.&nbsp; And how could it happen outside the die chamber?</p><p><br /></p><p>I’m OK if you don’t think my theory on the 2nd QUARTER is correct, but I cannot think of any way this could have occurred during the minting process.&nbsp; Somebody used to post on CT that we should focus on the question “How could this occur in the minting process” rather than “How can we explain the PMD”?&nbsp; That thought process makes sense when running across something different like the coin in the OP.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in