Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 2882446, member: 66&quot;]Yes that is definitely what it is.&nbsp; The thing is it needs to become better known.&nbsp; Best option for future appreciation would probably be to get it listed in the Cherrypickers Guide.&nbsp; I think Fivaz is still the guy editing it so he would be the one to talk to.&nbsp; If he feels it is significant enough he&#039;ll list it.</p><p><br /></p><p>With the typical die life on proof coins, if this wasn&#039;t discovered at the mint you can estimate a maximum mintage of around 3,500 to 4,000 pieces.&nbsp; If they did discover it, the mintage would be much lower.&nbsp; (I suspect a low mintage. it is very obvious but the first one wasn&#039;t discovered for two years and now the second one not for another year even after it was published in Coin World.&nbsp; At least I&#039;ve never heard of a second one.)&nbsp; Frankly to me this is a significant proof error kind of like the missing S errors, it missed an important step in the creation of the die, but I would not expect it to be as valuable even if it does become well known.</p><p><br /></p><p>Until it becomes well known though it is just a curiosity that no one knows anything about and there is no demand.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in