Mostly scratches but the one running across Lincoln's cost is a linear plating blister. You should keep this coin as a reference. It's shows the scratches are cut into the coin but the opposite is true for the blister.
I am having trouble understanding why people think that a scratched coin with plating blister is a "keeper"
Because she's new to collecting and it will assist in her learning. With both on the same coin the comparison is easily identifiable. That's why.
All those new to collecting should keep those coins with anomalies as a reference resource. Surely it is an invaluable learning tool to be able to compare future coin finds with a physical coin in hand
Actually sir collecting nut was super smart and very helpful to me he knows exactly to guide me. Especially I’m struggling to learn. Now I just found similar to this I don’t need to post and ask in the Ct because I already got one.