Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 24880557, member: 73489&quot;]If you are going to get more than one....<b>I would buy a RAW COA OGP plus a graded one for easy handling and viewing, 70 or 69.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>I would get a PL or DPL if the price was right.&nbsp; The prices OFFERED you saw seem very high.&nbsp; Check completed sales at ebay, HA, and GC.</p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>I have not checked the prices of these in years but they were in a bubble from 2009-11 and then prices fell bigtime. </b> Personally, I would only pay about a 10-15% premium over bullion for the ungraded raw....maybe 20-30% for a 70 or 69.&nbsp; If you REALLY like the look of the PL or DPL, I wouldn&#039;t go over $3,000. </p><p><br /></p><p><u>Again, that&#039;s based on my pricing from a few years ago, maybe pre-Covid.&nbsp; Pricing may have changed substantially (gold bullion has) but those are my general guidelines, give or take a few hundred dollars (which to me would not be a dealbreaker).</u></p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #ff8000">I have to say....I love this coin....but I really wish they would have used the 34 mm diameter size.&nbsp; </span></b>The coin seems &quot;short and stubby&quot; to me to compensate for the extra fineness of the gold.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know if they could have replicated the original 34 mm Saint-Gaudens MCMVII diameter and dimensions given the metallic composition...they would have had to cut the thickness if they went to 34 mm and kept the gold purity the same.</p><p><br /></p><p>Or....to keep the thickness the same as it is now, or to keep it the same as the MCMVII HR&#039;s given the smaller gold content...maybe make the coin slighly OVER 1 ounce of pure gold.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in