Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;tbudwiser, post: 1312993, member: 32774&quot;]Similar; as in same series and and denominations and same <i>type </i>of error note - face to back offset. I know that these blocks are not the same - this is why I pointed out that the other one is a BB block and NOT a CA block. They are very similar and <b>they were printed around the same time period in the same printing facility and only 4 months apart under the same newer series</b>. Any relevance there?? IMO, there would be. The BB was printed in January of 2011 and the CA was printed in April of 2011. I have been studying up and reading on purchasing myself a nice offset error and I have spent time looking at ligit AND fake ones in person and both of these look ligitimate and non-manufactured. Me posting the earlier thread was more of me explaining that it wouldn&#039;t be &#039;counterfeit&#039; and not so much as me trying to show proof of the error being ligit or not. There is a difference between a &#039;counterfeit note&#039; and a &#039;manufactured error&#039;. A counterfeit, from what I&#039;ve been tought in life, would be a dollar bill that was printed by someone other than the BEP. This is illegal and a Federal offense, as you most likely are already aware of. A manuactured error would be that someone tried to fake an error to sell the note and was caught. This could be done by putting the note through a printer and trying to print the offset, by tampering with the bill by using chemicals, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>-tbud<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in